The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, and responsive disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with shoulder instability. Development included 1) identification of a specific patient population; 2) generation of issues specific to the “disease” (“items”) from reviewing the literature, interviewing health caregivers, and interviewing patients representing all demographics, disease type and severity, and treatments; 3) item reduction using patient-generated frequency-importance products and correlation matrices; and 4) pretesting the prototype instrument on 2 groups of 10 patients. The final instrument, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, has 21 items representing 4 domains. The instrument attributes (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) were evaluated. Construct validation demonstrated that this index correlated predictably with other measures. Reliability was very high at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the index was more responsive (sensitive to change) than five other shoulder measurement tools (the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale; The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; the UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale; the Constant Score; and the Rowe Rating Scale), a global health instrument (the SF12), and range of motion. Since the patient's perception of changes in health status is the most important indicator of the success of a treatment, we suggest that this measurement tool be used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate treatments in this patient population, although it can also be used for monitoring patients' progress in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The social readjustment rating scale
Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4 · Cited by 11,067
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
Constant, C. R., & G. Murley, A. H. (1987) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023 · Cited by 5,300
Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., Bombardier, C., Beaton, D., Cole, D., Davis, A., Hawker, G., Katz, J. N., Makela, M., Marx, R. G., et al. (1996) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-l · Cited by 5,025
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009 · Cited by 3,958
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability
Bartko, J. J. (1966) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 · Cited by 2,299
Cited by
Shaha, J. S., Cook, J. B., Song, D. J., Rowles, D. J., Bottoni, C. R., Shaha, S. H., & Tokish, J. M. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546515578250 · Cited by 688
Scoring Systems for the Functional Assessment of the Shoulder
Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., & Dainty, K. (2003) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030 · Cited by 504
Self-citationThe Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity
Leggin, B. G., Michener, L. A., Shaffer, M. A., Brenneman, S. K., Iannotti, J. P., & Williams, G. R. (2006) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138 · Cited by 278
Johannessen, E. C., Reiten, H. S., Løvaas, H., Maeland, S., & Juul-Kristensen, B. (2016) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1102336 · Cited by 61
Liaghat, B., Skou, S. T., Søndergaard, J., Boyle, E., Søgaard, K., & Juul-Kristensen, B. (2022) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-105223 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., McLintock, H., & Ng, L.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 764-772
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2136649473
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/03635465980260060501
- The paper
- Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., McLintock, H., & Ng, L. (1998). The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Tool for Shoulder Instability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260060501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.