Cited by 27Shoulder Injury and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Short-term effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Liaghat, Behnam, Skou, Søren T, Søndergaard, Jens, Boyle, Eleanor, Søgaard, Karen, Juul-Kristensen, Birgit·2022·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of high-load versus low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and shoulder symptoms. Methods: A superiority, parallel-group, randomised trial (balanced block randomisation, electronic concealment) including adult patients (n=100) from primary care with HSD and shoulder pain and/or shoulder instability ≥3 months. Patients received 16 weeks of shoulder exercises (three sessions/week): HEAVY (n=50, full-range, high-load, supervised twice/week) or LIGHT (n=50, neutral/mid-range, low-load, supervised three times). The primary outcome was the 16-week between-group difference in self-reported function measured with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI, scale 0–2100, 0=best, minimal important difference 252 points). Secondary outcomes were self-reported measures including quality of life and clinical tests including shoulder muscle strength and range of motion. An intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation was conducted by a blinded biostatistician using linear regression. Results: 93 of 100 patients (93%) completed the 16-week evaluation. The mean WOSI score between-group difference significantly favoured HEAVY (−174.5 points, 95% CI −341.4 to −7.7, adjusted for age, sex, baseline score, clustering around clinic). The secondary outcomes were inconclusive, but patients in HEAVY were less likely to have a positive shoulder rotation test >180°, and more likely to rate an important improvement in physical symptoms. There were no serious adverse events, but HEAVY was associated with more transient muscle soreness (56% vs 37%) and headaches (40% vs 20%). Conclusion: High-load shoulder strengthening exercise was statistically superior to low-load strengthening exercise for self-reported function at 16 weeks and may be used in primary care to treat patients with HSD and shoulder pain and/or instability to improve shoulder function in the short term. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance, and patients should be supported to manage associated minor adverse events. Trial registration number: NCT03869307 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105223

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A randomized trial of 100 adult patients demonstrated that after 16 weeks of therapy, high-load shoulder strengthening exercise was statistically superior to low-load strengthening exercise for self-reported function.

    “A randomized trial of 100 adult patients demonstrated that after 16 weeks of therapy, high-load shoulder strengthening exercise was statistically superior to low-load strengthening exercise for self-reported function.[63]”

    From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

  • No serious adverse events were noted in a randomized trial of high-load versus low-load shoulder strengthening exercise.

    “No serious adverse events were noted.”

    From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [12]Spanhove V, Calders P, Berckmans K, et al. Electromyographic Muscle Activity and Three‐Dimensional Scapular Kinematics in Patients With Multidirectional Shoulder Instability: A Study in the Hypermobile Type of the Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome and the Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders. Arthritis Care Res 2022; 74: 833– 40. 10.1002/acr.24525 33253470 · DOI
  2. [38]Møller MB, Kjær M, Svensson RB, et al. Functional adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to resistance training in three patients with genetically verified classic Ehlers Danlos syndrome. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014; 4: 315– 23. 10.32098/mltj.03.2014.09 25489549 PMC4241422 · DOI
  3. [48]Bentsen BG, Natvig B, Winnem M. Questions you didn't ask? COOP/WONCA Charts in clinical work and research. World Organization of Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicists. Fam Pract 1999; 16: 190– 5. 10.1093/fampra/16.2.190 10381028 · DOI
  4. [72]Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, et al. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 764– 72. 10.1177/03635465980260060501 9850776 · DOI
  5. [76]Dong W, Goost H, Lin X-B, et al. Treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome: a PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 2015; 94: e510. 10.1097/MD.0000000000000510 25761173 PMC4602475 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liaghat, B., Skou, S. T., Søndergaard, J., Boyle, E., Søgaard, K., & Juul-Kristensen, B.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Liaghat, Behnam
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
56
Issue
22
Pages
1269-1276
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W4281764601
Cited by
27
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Fund for Research, Quality and Education in Physiotherapy Practice
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Region of Southern Denmark
  • Esbjerg municipality
  • Danish Rheumatism Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
hypermobility spectrum disorders, shoulder instability, shoulder pain, shoulder function, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, muscle strength, range of motion, primary care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review