Cited by 37Chinese history and philosophyReligion and Society InteractionsReligious Freedom and Discrimination

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Concept of Religion in China and the West

Goossaert, Vincent·2005·Diogenes

Abstract

The religious question in China, which is today marked by various conflicts between the state and unrecognized confessional organizations, can be understood only in a historical perspective. In particular the adoption early in the 20th century of a notion of religion coming directly from the West, and narrowly defined, has justified a policy that grants a relative but controlled freedom to five great religions while actively condemning others, which are seen as ‘superstitions’. The article details the implications of this notion of ‘religion’ in modern and contemporary China and looks at how Chinese religious traditions have adapted to it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0392192105050596

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a segment of Hong Kong's population that, influenced by PRC rhetoric and May 4th Modernist discourse, has stripped the derogatory connotations from 'superstition' and has internalized the term to continue following popular religion.

    “Thus, there is a segment of Hong Kong's population that, influenced by PRC rhetoric and May 4th Modernist discourse, has stripped the derogatory connotations from 'superstition' and has internalized the term to continue following popular religion (Goossaert 2005).”

    From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Goossaert 2005

  • This intellectual movement included the creation of the very concepts and terms 'religion' and 'supernatural' which did not exist in pre-19th century Chinese.

    “Indeed, this intellectual movement included the creation of the very concepts and terms 'religion' and 'supernatural' which did not exist in pre-19th century Chinese (Goossaert 2005).”

    From Chinese popular religion and Hong Kong identity (2015) · cites this paper as Goossaert 2005

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bastid-Bruguière, 1998, Liang Qichao yu zongjiao wenti, 70
  2. Lagerwey, 1997, Renouveau religieux en Asie, 3
  3. Nedostup, Rebecca Allyn (2001) ‘Religion, Superstition, and Governing Society in Nationalist China’, PhD dissertation, Columbia University.
  4. Goldfuss, 2001, Vers un bouddhisme du xxe siècle. Yang Wenhui (1837-1911), réformateur laïque et imprimeur

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goossaert, V.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Goossaert, Vincent
Venue
Diogenes
Published
2005-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 0392-1921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7695
OpenAlex
W2074965758
Cited by
37
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diogenes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
Keywords
concept of religion, Chinese religion, state-religion relations, religious freedom, superstition, Western influence on Chinese thought, religious adaptation, comparative religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review