Cited by 76Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Novel anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) monoclonal antibody lecanemab for Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review

Open access
Chowdhury, Selia, Chowdhury, Nurjahan Shipa·2023·International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lecanemab is the latest monoclonal antibody that targets beta-amyloid approved exclusively for treatment of Alzheimer's disease with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. This article aims to provide a systematic review of the efficacy, and safety of lecanemab in slowing clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: A comprehensive search of various databases, including the National Institute of Health clinical trials registry, PubMed, and the Cochrane library, was conducted until July 2023 using the keywords lecanemab, BAN2401, and Alzheimer's disease. Additionally, conference abstracts listed in the Cochrane database (including Embase) and drug information from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label were examined. Only clinical trials published in the English language were considered. In total, 107 articles were retrieved, and after thorough evaluation, three randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials involving 2729 participants were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The FDA approved lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in January 2023 which acts as a novel disease-modifying anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ) human monoclonal antibody and is administered intravenously. Based on the clinical trials included in this review, lecanemab was found efficacious in reducing the accumulation of beta-amyloid and slowing down the cognitive decline and it was well tolerated. Lecanemab had a statistically significant change from baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAScog14), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL), and reductions in brain amyloid burden. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, infusion-related reactions, and Amyloid related imaging abnormalities-edema. CONCLUSIONS: Lecanemab therapy led to a substantial decrease in amyloid plaques and a noticeable slowing of clinical decline. The findings suggest a meaningful connection between the reduction in amyloid and the positive impact on patients' clinical outcomes, hinting at potential disease-modifying effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03946320231209839

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is insufficient safety or efficacy information on starting lecanemab treatment sooner or later than in the conducted studies.

    “There is insufficient safety or efficacy information on starting treatment sooner or later than in the conducted studies [137,138,139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Lannfelt L Söderberg L Laudon H, et al. BAN2401 shows stronger binding to soluble aggregated amyloid-beta species than aducanumab. InBioArctic poster presentation. Alzheimer’s Association International Conference 2019; 14– 18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chowdhury, S., & Chowdhury, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
  • Dinajpur Medical College (BD)
Corresponding author
Chowdhury, Selia
Venue
International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology
Published
2023-01
Volume
37
Pages
3946320231209839-3946320231209839
ISSN
  • 0394-6320 (ISSN-L)
  • 2058-7384
OpenAlex
W4388014093
Cited by
76
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 23
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
lecanemab, Alzheimer's disease, anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody, amyloid plaques, disease-modifying therapy, cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia, treatment safety, adverse events, brain amyloid burden
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Alzheimer Disease, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review