Cited by 4Philippine History and CultureGlobal Energy Security and PolicyNatural Resources and Economic Development

Nuclear Power in the Philippines: The Plague that Poisons Morong!

Bello, Walden, Harris, John, Zarsky, Lyuba·1983·Review of Radical Political Economics

Abstract

In 1977 construction began on the first nuclear reactor in the Phillipines, part of an ambitious development program initiated by the Marcos dictatorship. As well as aiding the growth of industry, this program was to bring electricity to the urban and rural poor. Walden Bello, John Harris, and Lyuba Zarsky show convincingly that this "trickle-down" effect has not occurred, nor will it occur under existing social conditions, where much of the electricity produced supports export-led industrialization and personal consumption by a local elite. Yet electrification has helped legitimate the Marcos regime, it has forged an alliance with technocrats and bureaucrats, and has helped to fight counterinsurgency. Why did Marcos choose nuclear power, rather than fossil fuels? The authors argue that the main determinant was U. S. influence, though other factors entered, such as enhancing the regimes prestige by.achieving "modernity. " Yet the Westinghouse reactor has been a thorn in Marcos' side. Plagued with exposures of corruption and financial waste and the discovery that it is built on active earthquake faults, it has become a unifying symbol for opposition to the regime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/048661348301500306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 1983 report identified the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant as a mechanism for securing financial gain for the president and his cronies, bolstering US imperial control through monopolization of nuclear technology, and buttressing claims to modernity through nationalization of nuclear power.

    “Instead, they identi fi ed the plant as a mechanism for securing fi nancial gain for the president and his cronies, bolstering US imperial control over the islands through its monopolization of nuclear technology (Marcos commissioned the US company Westinghouse to construct the plant), and buttressing claims to modernity through the nationalization of nuclear power (Bello, Harris, and Zarsky 1983,”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bello, W., Harris, J., & Zarsky, L.
Affiliations
Nautilus (United States) (US)
Venue
Review of Radical Political Economics
Published
1983-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
51-65
ISSN
  • 0486-6134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8502
OpenAlex
W1970154763
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Radical Political Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Philippine History and Culture
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
nuclear energy, Marcos regime, Philippine politics, electrification, export-oriented industrialization, elite consumption, counterinsurgency, United States influence, corruption, earthquake faults, regime legitimacy, modernity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review