The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural Consultation: A Model of Mental Health Service for Multicultural Societies
Abstract
Objectives: This paper reports results from the evaluation of a cultural consultation service (CCS) for mental health practitioners and primary care clinicians. The service was designed to improve the delivery of mental health services in mainstream settings for a culturally diverse urban population including immigrants, refugees, and ethnocultural minority groups. Cultural consultations were based on an expanded version of the DSM-IV cultural formulation and made use of cultural consultants and culture brokers. Methods: We documented the service development process through participant observation. We systematically evaluated the first 100 cases referred to the service to establish the reasons for consultation, the types of cultural formulations and recommendations, and the consultation outcome in terms of the referring clinician's satisfaction and recommendation concordance. Results: Cases seen by the CCS clearly demonstrated the impact of cultural misunderstandings: incomplete assessments, incorrect diagnoses, inadequate or inappropriate treatment, and failed treatment alliances. Clinicians referring patients to the service reported high rates of satisfaction with the consultations, but many indicated a need for long-term follow-up. Conclusion: The cultural consultation model effectively supplements existing services to improve diagnostic assessment and treatment for a culturally diverse urban population. Clinicians need training in working with interpreters and culture brokers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Cited by
Mental Health of Immigrants and Refugees
Pumariega, A. J., Rothe, E., & Pumariega, J. B. (2005) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-005-6363-1 · Cited by 584
Thomson, M. S., Chaze, F., George, U., & Guruge, S. (2015) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-015-0175-3 · Cited by 256
Renzaho, A. M. N., Romios, P., Crock, C., & Sonderlund, A. L. (2013) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzt006 · Cited by 204
Barriers to Implementing the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview: A Qualitative Study
Aggarwal, N. K., Nicasio, A. V., DeSilva, R., Boiler, M., & Lewis-Fernández, R. (2013) · Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-013-9325-z · Cited by 159
van Loon, A., van Schaik, A., Dekker, J., & Beekman, A. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.014 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirmayer, L. J., Groleau, D., Guzder, J., Blake, C., & Jarvis, E.
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 145-153
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- OpenAlex
- W2403122459
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural Consultation: A Model of Mental Health Service for Multicultural Societies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/070674370304800302
- The paper
- Kirmayer, L. J., Groleau, D., Guzder, J., Blake, C., & Jarvis, E. (2003). Cultural Consultation: A Model of Mental Health Service for Multicultural Societies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.