Cited by 73Cultural Competency in Health CareMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Bridging the gap for ethnic minority adult outpatients with depression and anxiety disorders by culturally adapted treatments

van Loon, Annelies, van Schaik, Anneke, Dekker, Jack, Beekman, Aartjan·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Culturally adapted guideline driven depression and anxiety treatments have been developed for ethnic minority patients in Western countries to boost effectiveness for these growing and vulnerable groups. The aims of this study are to systematically review the empirical literature of outcomes associated with culturally adapted guideline driven depression and anxiety interventions, to describe the cultural adaptation and to identify the contribution of the cultural adaptation and approach as such.Method Comprehensive search of the major bibliographical databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed; Psychinfo) for randomized controlled trials.Results Nine eligible studies were identified and all were conducted in the USA. The pooled random standardized differences in means of the culturally adapted depression and anxiety treatment on clinical outcome was 1.06 (CI 95% 0.51-1.62, P=0.00). Two studies demonstrated effectiveness of the population specific cultural adaptation per se. All studies incorporated a focus on cultural values and beliefs as a cultural adaptation.Limitation We only identified a small number of USA studies so generalisation of the findings to other western countries can be discussed.Conclusion Culturally adapted guideline driven depression and anxiety treatment was effective for USA minority patients from different cultural backgrounds. There is some evidence for the effectiveness of the population specific cultural adaptation as such.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2012.12.014

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Loon, A., van Schaik, A., Dekker, J., & Beekman, A.
Affiliations
  • Arkin (NL)
  • GGZ inGeest (NL)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
147
Issue
1-3
Pages
9-16
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169838410
Cited by
73
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Organisation for Health and Development (100-004-007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
culturally tailored interventions, depression, anxiety disorders, ethnic minority patients, treatment effectiveness, cultural values and beliefs, outpatients, mental health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Culture, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Outpatients, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Cultural Competency, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review