Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Common Mental Disorders in the Workforce: Recent Findings from Descriptive and Social Epidemiology

Open access
Sanderson, Kristy, Andrews, Gavin·2006·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1177/070674370605100202
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: To review the recent descriptive and social epidemiology of common mental disorders in the workplace, including prevalence, participation, work disability, and impact of quality of work, as well as to discuss the implications for identifying targets for clinical and preventive interventions. Method: We conducted a structured review of epidemiologic studies in community settings (that is, in the general population or in workplaces). Evidence was restricted to the peer-reviewed, published, English-language literature up to the end of June 2005. We further restricted evidence to studies that used recent classification systems; then, if evidence was insufficient, we reviewed studies that used standardized psychiatric screening scales. To distinguish this article from recent reviews of health and work quality, we focused on new areas of investigation and new evidence for established areas of investigation: underemployment, organizational justice, job control and demand, effort–reward imbalance, and atypical (nonpermanent) employment. Results: Depression and simple phobia were found to be the most prevalent disorders in the working population. The limited data on rates of participation suggested higher participation among people with depression, simple phobia, social phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Depression and anxiety were more consistently associated with “presenteeism” (that is, lost productivity while at work) than with absenteeism, whether this was measured by cutback days or by direct questionnaires. Seven longitudinal studies, with an average sample size of 6264, showed a strong association between aspects of low job quality and incident depression and anxiety. There was some evidence that atypical work was associated with poorer mental health, although the findings for fixed-term work were mixed. Conclusions: Mental health risk reduction in the workplace is an important complement to clinical interventions for reducing the current and future burden of depression and anxiety in the workplace.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674370605100202

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012 · DOI
  2. World Health Organization, International Labour Organization, 2000, Mental health and work: Impact, issues, and good practices
  3. 10.1136/oem.2004.013896 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/01.jom.0000052967.43131.51 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00043-X · DOI
  6. 10.2105/AJPH.2003.035873 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024633 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2165/00019053-200422030-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00028-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062551.76504.A9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/aje/kwf182 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00349-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/ije/dyi024 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/026783799296084 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00170-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/oem.60.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1316 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00001-9 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00109-5 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.006 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kivimäki M, 2000, Br J Psychiatry, 320, 971
  26. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00431-1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1017/S0033291797004807 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/mhp.93 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/s001270050010 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0033291797005308 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01127.x · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00513.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1097/01.jom.0000100200.90573.df · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1097/01.jom.0000126684.82825.0a · DOI
  35. 10.1176/appi.ps.55.12.1371 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.2307/2676295 · DOI
  37. 10.1097/01.nmd.0000110242.97744.bc · DOI
  38. Paterniti S, 2002, Br J Psychiatry, 181, 111
  39. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.038 · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0033291702006591 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00400-3 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.013 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/ije/dyg319 · DOI
  44. 10.1136/oem.60.12.948 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s00127-003-0658-8 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00109-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00017 · DOI
  48. 10.1176/appi.ps.55.1.29 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01510.x · DOI
  50. 10.1097/01.jom.0000126687.49652.44 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1136/jech.54.7.502 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1097/01.jom.0000131797.52458.c8 · DOI
  53. Benach J, 2002, Types of employment and health in the European Union
  54. 10.1136/jech.56.8.569 · DOI
  55. 10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/S0163-8343(00)00072-4 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1001/jama.286.11.1325 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1176/ps.50.9.1209 · DOI
  59. 10.2105/AJPH.86.3.332 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1136/jech.56.9.693 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sanderson, K., & Andrews, G.
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
63-75
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
DOI
10.1177/070674370605100202
OpenAlex
W2097521237
Cited by
370
References
9
FWCI
35.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.