What Does “Irremediability” in Mental Illness Mean?
Open accessAbstract
Keywords medical assistance in dying (MAiD), physician-assisted death, irremediability, ethics, health care policy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is considerable conceptual debate about how irremediability should be defined in the context of psychiatric EAS, and whether an objective or subjective standard should prevail.
“There is considerable conceptual debate about how irremediability should be defined in the context of psychiatric EAS, and whether an objective or subjective standard should prevail (Gaind, 2020; Nicolini, Kim, Churchill, & Gastmans, 2020a; Schuklenk, 2019; Sinyor & Schaffer, 2020; Smith, 2020; van Veen, Ruissen, & Widdershoven, 2020).”
From Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard (2023) · cites this paper as Gaind, 2020
Experiences of stigma have been reported as contributing more to the intolerability of suffering among people with mental disorders than the symptoms of the disorder.
“Experiences of stigma have been reported as contributing more to the intolerability of suffering among people with mental disorders than the symptoms of the disorder [33].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Some healthcare professionals feel ill-prepared to follow the law, failing to know how it applies to patients and how to apply it without discrimination.
“Some healthcare professionals feel ill-prepared to follow the law, failing to know how it applies to patients [56] and how to apply it without discrimination [33] (e.g., without being influenced by biases against mental disorders).”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress because the criteria might not consider the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior, contemporary psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual's potential for a life worth living.
“For some disorders, such as borderline personality disorders, a physician intervening by MAiD-NT could encounter moral distress, since the criteria for the procedure might not take into consideration the common fluctuating suicidal ideation and behavior in these disorders, the contemporary forms of psychosocial rehabilitation treatment, and the individual’s potential for having a life worth living”
From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [72]
Some socially disadvantaged people might consider MAiD-MD to escape suffering and stressors caused by their reality, such as social isolation, homelessness, poverty, inadequate housing, and unemployment.
“Some socially disadvantaged people might consider MAiD-MD to escape the suffering and stressors caused by their reality [6], such as social isolation, homelessness, poverty, inadequate housing, and unemployment [33, 34].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Acknowledging the irremediability of a person's condition can promote hope, empathy and engagement and thus promote recovery, making that person feel genuinely considered.
“Conversely, some authors point out that acknowledging the irremediability of a person’s condition can promote hope, empathy and engagement and thus promote recovery [33], making that person feel genuinely considered [37].”
From Medical assistance in dying for people living with mental disorders: a qualitative thematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Gaind, K. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gaind, Karandeep Sonu
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-05-22
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 604-606
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- PMC
- PMC7485032
- OpenAlex
- W3027713501
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, physician-assisted death, mental illness, end-of-life decisions, health policy
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Physicians, Suicide, Suicide, Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review