Cited by 41Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Associations Between Canada's Cannabis Legalization and Emergency Department Presentations for Transient Cannabis-Induced Psychosis and Schizophrenia Conditions: Ontario and Alberta, 2015–2019

Open access
Callaghan, Russell C., Sanches, Marcos, Murray, Robin M., Konefal, Sarah, Maloney-Hall, Bridget, Kish, Stephen J.·2022·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Cannabis legalization in many jurisdictions worldwide has raised concerns that such legislation might increase the burden of transient and persistent psychotic illnesses in society. Our study aimed to address this issue. Methods: Drawing upon emergency department (ED) presentations aggregated across Alberta and Ontario, Canada records (April 1, 2015–December 31, 2019), we employed Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) models to assess associations between Canada's cannabis legalization (via the Cannabis Act implemented on October 17, 2018) and weekly ED presentation counts of the following ICD-10-CA-defined target series of cannabis-induced psychosis (F12.5; n = 5832) and schizophrenia and related conditions (“schizophrenia”; F20-F29; n = 211,661), as well as two comparison series of amphetamine-induced psychosis (F15.5; n = 10,829) and alcohol-induced psychosis (F10.5; n = 1,884). Results: ED presentations for cannabis-induced psychosis doubled between April 2015 and December 2019. However, across all four SARIMA models, there was no evidence of significant step-function effects associated with cannabis legalization on post-legalization weekly ED counts of: (1) cannabis-induced psychosis [0.34 (95% CI −4.1; 4.8; P = 0.88)]; (2) schizophrenia [24.34 (95% CI −18.3; 67.0; P = 0.26)]; (3) alcohol-induced psychosis [0.61 (95% CI −0.6; 1.8; P = 0.31); or (4) amphetamine-induced psychosis [1.93 (95% CI −2.8; 6.7; P = 0.43)]. Conclusion: Implementation of Canada's cannabis legalization framework was not associated with evidence of significant changes in cannabis-induced psychosis or schizophrenia ED presentations. Given the potentially idiosyncratic rollout of Canada's cannabis legalization, further research will be required to establish whether study results generalize to other settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07067437211070650

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comparison of hospitalization rates before and after legalization in Callaghan et al. did not take account of the fact that cannabis-related psychiatric presentations were increasing before legalization of adult use.

    “The comparison of hospitalization rates before and after legalization did not take account of the fact that cannabis‐related psychiatric presentations were increasing before legalization of adult use.”

    From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods (Analytic Plan; page not available in our copy) say the authors fitted models to 185 weeks of pre-legalization data and used those models to forecast post-legalization presentations. The claim that their comparison did not account for the pre-legalization pattern is therefore contrary to the described analysis. The paper studies emergency-department presentations, not hospitalization rates. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ED presentations for cannabis-induced psychosis doubled between April 2015 and December 2019 in Alberta and Ontario, but there was no significant increase associated with cannabis legalization.

    “ED presentations for cannabis‐induced psychosis doubled between April 2015 and December 2019, but there was no significant increase associated with cannabis legalization.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [2]Leyton M. Cannabis legalization: did we make a mistake? Update 2019. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2019; 44(5): 291‐ 293. 31452361 PMC6710088
  2. [4]Hindley G Beck K Borgan F, et al. Psychiatric symptoms caused by cannabis constituents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(4): 344‐ 353. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30074-2 32197092 PMC7738353 · DOI
  3. [5]Ganesh S Cortes-Briones J Ranganathan M, et al. Psychosis-relevant effects of intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a mega analysis of individual participant-data from human laboratory studies. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020; 23(9): 559‐ 570. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa031 32385508 PMC7710917 · DOI
  4. [8]van der Steur SJ Batalla A Bossong MG. Factors moderating the association between cannabis use and psychosis risk: a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(2): 97. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10020097 PMC7071602 32059350 · DOI
  5. [9]Hamilton I Sumnall H. Are we any closer to identifying a causal relationship between cannabis and psychosis? Curr Opin Psychol. 2021; 38: 56‐ 60. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.027 32828987 · DOI
  6. [10]D’Souza DC Abi-Saab WM Madonick S, et al. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol effects in schizophrenia: implications for cognition, psychosis, and addiction. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 57(6): 594‐ 608. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.006 15780846 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [12]Callaghan RC Sanches M Kish SJ. Quantity and frequency of cannabis use in relation to cannabis-use disorder and cannabis-related problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217: 108271. 32977043
  8. [13]Hall W Lynskey M. Evaluating the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States. Addiction. 2016; 111(10): 1764‐ 1773. 27082374
  9. [14]Pacula RL Smart R. Medical marijuana and marijuana legalization. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017; 13(3): 397‐ 419. 28482686 PMC6358421
  10. [15]Callaghan RC Vander Heiden J Sanches M, et al. Impacts of Canada’s cannabis legalization on police-reported crime among youth: early evidence. Addiction. 2021; 116(12): 3454‐ 3462. DOI: 10.1111/add.15535 34085338 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [16]Adinoff B Cooper ZD. Cannabis legalization: progress in harm reduction approaches for substance use and misuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019; 45(6): 707‐ 712. 31755837
  12. [17]Pauly B Brown M Chow C, et al. “If I knew I could get that every hour instead of alcohol, I would take the cannabis”: need and feasibility of cannabis substitution implementation in Canadian managed alcohol programs. Harm Reduct J. 2021; 18(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/S12954-021-00512-5 34162375 PMC8220712 · DOI
  13. [20]Degenhardt L Roxburgh A McKetin R. Hospital separations for cannabis- and methamphetamine-related psychotic episodes in Australia. Med J Aust. 2007; 186(7): 342‐ 345. 17407429
  14. [21]Hjorthoj C Larsen MO Starzer MSK, et al. Annual incidence of cannabis-induced psychosis, other substance-induced psychoses and dually diagnosed schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder in Denmark from 1994 to 2016. Psychol Med. 2021; 51(4): 1‐ 6. 31839011
  15. [22]Jongsma HE Turner C Kirkbride JB, et al. International incidence of psychotic disorders, 2002-17: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Heal. 2019; 4(5): e229‐ e244. PMC6693560 31054641
  16. [23]Box GEP Tiao GC. Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 1975; 70(349): 70‐ 79.
  17. [24]Cryer JD Chan K-S. Time series regression models. In: Casella G Fienberg S Okin I, editor. Time series analysis with applications in R. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2008. p.249-276.
  18. [25]Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974; 19(6): 716‐ 723.
  19. [26]Durbin J Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: i. Biometrika. 1950; 37(3/4): 409‐ 428. 14801065
  20. [29]Arnold BF Hogan DR Colford JM, et al. Simulation methods to estimate design power: an overview for applied research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11(1): 94. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-94 21689447 PMC3146952 · DOI
  21. [31]Di Forti M Quattrone D Freeman TP, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2019; 6(5): 427‐ 436. 30902669 PMC7646282
  22. [32]Fischer B Russell C Sabioni P, et al. Lower-risk cannabis use guidelines: a comprehensive update of evidence and recommendations. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(8): e1‐ e12. PMC5508136 28644037
  23. [33]Rotermann M. What has changed since cannabis was legalized? Heal Reports. 2020; 31(2): 11‐ 20. 32073644
  24. [34]Asbridge M Valleriani J Kwok J, et al. Normalization and denormalization in different legal contexts: comparing cannabis and tobacco. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2016; 23(3): 212‐ 223.
  25. [37]Mahamad S Wadsworth E Rynard V, et al. Availability, retail price and potency of legal and illegal cannabis in Canada after recreational cannabis legalisation. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020; 39(4): 337‐ 346. 32291811
  26. [44]Maloney-Hall B Wallingford SC Konefal S, et al. Psychotic disorder and cannabis use: Canadian hospitalization trends, 2006–2015. Heal Promot Chronic Dis Prev Canada. 2020; 40(5/6): 176‐ 183. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.5/6.06 PMC7367424 32529977 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [45]Freeman TP Groshkova T Cunningham A, et al. Increasing potency and price of cannabis in Europe, 2006–16. Addiction. 2019; 114(6): 1015‐ 1023. DOI: 10.1111/add.14525 30597667 PMC6590252 · DOI
  28. [46]Quan H Sundararajan V Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005; 43(11): 1130‐ 1139. 16224307
  29. [47]Quan H Li B Saunders LD, et al. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res. 2008; 43(4): 1424‐ 1441. 18756617 PMC2517283

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callaghan, R. C., Sanches, M., Murray, R. M., Konefal, S., Maloney-Hall, B., & Kish, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (CA)
  • Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author
Callaghan, Russell C.
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2022-01-12
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
616-625
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W4206014033
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
This work was supported through a research contract with the lead author (RCC) funded by the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction using Health Canada Cannabis Research Initiative funds. (Not applicable)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis legalization, Cannabis Act, cannabis-induced psychosis, schizophrenia, emergency department presentation, psychosis, amphetamine psychosis, alcohol-induced psychosis, Ontario, Alberta
MeSH terms
Alberta, Amphetamines, Cannabis, Marijuana Abuse, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Ontario, Psychotic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review