The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unrewarding Work, Coworker Support, and Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis
Abstract
Beneficial effects of social support in the workplace have received only limited attention from sociologists. Workgroup interactions, especially social support received from coworkers, may significantly contribute to job satisfaction. This article assesses the effects of coworker support on job satisfaction, paying particular attention to the nature and influence of instrumental coworker support both relative to and in conjunction with affective coworker support. The authors expect that both affective and instrumental social support will exert significant and independent effects on these outcomes and that instrumental support will buffer the effects of nonrewarding work on job satisfaction. These hypotheses are tested in a series of ordinary least squares regression models. Data are drawn from a nationally representative sample of 2,505 full-time employees. Study findings are consistent with a main effects model of workplace social support. Suggestions for the absence of buffering effects, implications for industrial policy, and future research efforts are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT TO HOST RESISTANCE1
CASSEL, J. (1976) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112281 · Cited by 1,816 · cited 1×
“Under conditions of low stress, however, the amount of social support should have little impact on well-being (Caplan, 1974; Cassel, 1976; Cobb, 1976).”
Background
Cited by
The Psychology of Working Theory.
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000140 · Cited by 1,020
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An empirical investigation among ICT-SMEs
Valaei, N., & Rezaei, S. (2016) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2015-0216 · Cited by 659
Job stress and poor sleep quality: data from an American sample of full-time workers.
Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.020 · Cited by 263
Self-citationKnudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.02.003 · Cited by 163
Self-citationYang, Z., Zhang, H., Kwan, H. K., & Chen, S. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2943-3 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- DUCHARME, L. J., & MARTIN, J. K.
- Venue
- Work and Occupations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-243
- ISSN
- 0093-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 0730-8884
- 1552-8464
- OpenAlex
- W2066014483
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unrewarding Work, Coworker Support, and Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0730888400027002005
- The paper
- DUCHARME, L. J., & MARTIN, J. K. (2000). Unrewarding Work, Coworker Support, and Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis. Work and Occupations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888400027002005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.