Rethinking greenwashing: Corporate discourse, unethical practice, and the unmet potential of ethical consumerism
Abstract
Utilizing data drawn from online and print advertisements, this research compares the green advertising techniques of companies with well-documented strong and weak social and environmental track records. Notwithstanding more subtle, divergent narratives suggesting that more responsible companies direct the consumer gaze toward more political and systemic issues while their counterparts tend to emphasize relatively low-cost, scientific, and philanthropic efforts, the main findings indicate that all companies employ a very similar grand narrative focused on consumer empowerment regardless of their actual ethical track record. This suggests that most attempts, by consumers and scholars alike, to determine anything meaningful about actual corporate practices via an analysis of environmental advertising, may be largely futile. A dramaturgical framework is employed to argue that the findings are most suitably explained by reframing green advertising as a form of impression management for an audience of ethical consumers. Thus, greenwashing emerges only when such performances are contradicted by a company’s actual environmental track record. The author proposes a more relational definition of greenwashing to reorient the analytical focus on the processes behind, and connections between, the product, the company, and the industry, including their broader cultural context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Commercial consumer marketing creates ethical problems because it works.
“While this may be an honourable objective, it should not be forgotten that commercial consumer marketing creates ethical problems because it works [62].”
From Marketing Tactics for Sustainable Fashion and the Circular Economy: The Impact of Ethical Labels on Fast Fashion Choice (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 147 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Jones, E.
- Affiliations
- College of the Holy Cross (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Ellis
- ORCID
- Jones, Ellis
- Venue
- Sociological Perspectives
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-05-26
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 728-754
- ISSN
- 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8673
- OpenAlex
- W2946934327
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 147
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- greenwashing, green advertising, impression management, ethical consumption, business discourse, consumer empowerment, corporate social responsibility, advertising narratives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review