Cited by 78Municipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and RecyclingHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management

Sampling Household Waste at Source: Lessons Learnt in Gaborone

Bolaane, Benjamin, Ali, Mansoor·2004·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) quantity and composition analysis is fundamental for the planning of municipal waste management services. The purpose of this paper is to report the results and experiences of sampling household waste at the source of generation in Gaborone, Botswana. The average generation rate, in kg capita -1 day -1 , and percentages of various components of waste in Gaborone were determined using a statistically designed household sampling survey. The survey covered 47 households with different socio-economic characteristics over 21 days with 893 samples obtained. The results showed that the average waste generation rate for Gaborone was 0.33 kg capita -1 day -1 . Contrary to common belief, the waste generation rate measured as in weight units was found not be directly related to household income. However, the packaging fractions of plastic and paper measured as volume had a direct relationship with household income. Across all income groups, the putrescible waste fraction constituted the highest proportion of the waste stream at approximately 68%. The main general conclusion is on the importance of practical considerations. As much as statistically designed sampling procedures provide a useful means of estimating the quantity and composition of household waste at source of generation, there are some practical issues that should be carefully considered during sampling to improve the accuracy and relevance of the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x04044970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bolaane and Ali found that the rate of waste generation was not directly related to household income.

    “Moreover, in a survey of 47 households in Gaborone (Botswana), Bolaane and Ali (2004) found that the rate of waste generation (measured as in weight units) was not directly related to household income.”

    From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Bolaane and Ali, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolaane, B., & Ali, M.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bolaane, Benjamin
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2004-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
142-148
ISSN
  • 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3669
OpenAlex
W2062941157
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Keywords
household waste, municipal solid waste, waste generation rate, waste composition, household income, plastic waste, paper waste, putrescible waste, Gaborone, waste management planning
MeSH terms
Botswana, Data Collection, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Income, Refuse Disposal, Social Class, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review