The DOI matches its Crossref record.
C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems
Abstract
Global warming potential (GWP) is an important impact category in life-cycle-assessment modelling of waste management systems. However, accounting of biogenic CO 2 emissions and sequestered biogenic carbon in landfills and in soils, amended with compost, is carried out in different ways in reported studies. A simplified model of carbon flows is presented for the waste management system and the surrounding industries, represented by the pulp and paper manufacturing industry, the forestry industry and the energy industry. The model calculated the load of C to the atmosphere, under ideal conditions, for 14 different waste management scenarios under a range of system boundary conditions and a constant consumption of C-product (here assumed to be paper) and energy production within the combined system. Five sets of criteria for assigning GWP indices to waste management systems were applied to the same 14 scenarios and tested for their ability to rank the waste management alternatives reflecting the resulting CO 2 load to the atmosphere. Two complete criteria sets were identified yielding fully consistent results; one set considers biogenic CO 2 as neutral, the other one did not. The results showed that criteria for assigning global warming contributions are partly linked to the system boundary conditions. While the boundary to the paper industry and the energy industry usually is specified in LCA studies, the boundary to the forestry industry and the interaction between forestry and the energy industry should also be specified and accounted for.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013 · Cited by 757
Self-citationLaurent, A., Clavreul, J., Bernstad, A., Bakas, I., Niero, M., Gentil, E., Christensen, T. H., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.004 · Cited by 451
Self-citationBishop, G., Styles, D., & Lens, P. N. L. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105451 · Cited by 401
Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems
Clavreul, J., Guyonnet, D., & Christensen, T. H. (2012) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008 · Cited by 358
Self-citationBlack Soldier Fly biowaste treatment – Assessment of global warming potential
Mertenat, A., Diener, S., & Zurbrügg, C. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.040 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, T. H., Gentil, E., Boldrin, A., Larsen, A. W., Weidema, B. P., & Hauschild, M.
- Venue
- Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 707-715
- ISSN
- 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
- 1096-3669
- OpenAlex
- W2153300627
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0734242x08096304
- The paper
- Christensen, T. H., Gentil, E., Boldrin, A., Larsen, A. W., Weidema, B. P., & Hauschild, M. (2009). C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x08096304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.