Cited by 270Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementLandfill Environmental Impact Studies

Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution

Open access
Møller, Jacob, Boldrin, Alessio, Christensen, Thomas H.·2009·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of source-separated municipal solid waste (MSW) and use of the digestate is presented from a global warming (GW) point of view by providing ranges of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are useful for calculation of global warming factors (GWFs), i.e. the contribution to GW measured in CO(2)-equivalents per tonne of wet waste. The GHG accounting was done by distinguishing between direct contributions at the AD facility and indirect upstream or downstream contributions. GHG accounting for a generic AD facility with either biogas utilization at the facility or upgrading of the gas for vehicle fuel resulted in a GWF from -375 (a saving) to 111 (a load) kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1) wet waste. In both cases the digestate was used for fertilizer substitution. This large range was a result of the variation found for a number of key parameters: energy substitution by biogas, N(2)O-emission from digestate in soil, fugitive emission of CH( 4), unburned CH(4), carbon bound in soil and fertilizer substitution. GWF for a specific type of AD facility was in the range -95 to -4 kg CO(2)-eq. tonne(-1) wet waste. The ranges of uncertainty, especially of fugitive losses of CH(4) and carbon sequestration highly influenced the result. In comparison with the few published GWFs for AD, the range of our data was much larger demonstrating the need to use a consistent and robust approach to GHG accounting and simultaneously accept that some key parameters are highly uncertain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x09344876

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Møller, J., Boldrin, A., & Christensen, T. H.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2009-09-11
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
813-824
ISSN
  • 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3669
OpenAlex
W2101657334
Cited by
270
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
33.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, digestate, greenhouse gas accounting, municipal solid waste, biogas utilization, nitrous oxide emissions, carbon sequestration, fertilizer substitution, global warming potential
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Bacteria, Anaerobic, Biodegradation, Environmental, Carbon Dioxide, Environmental Monitoring, Methane, Refuse Disposal, Bioreactors, Biofuels, Global Warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review