The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions
Open accessAbstract
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to composting of organic waste and the use of compost were assessed from a waste management perspective. The GHG accounting for composting includes use of electricity and fuels, emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from the composting process, and savings obtained by the use of the compost. The GHG account depends on waste type and composition (kitchen organics, garden waste), technology type (open systems, closed systems, home composting), the efficiency of off-gas cleaning at enclosed composting systems, and the use of the compost. The latter is an important issue and is related to the long-term binding of carbon in the soil, to related effects in terms of soil improvement and to what the compost substitutes; this could be fertilizer and peat for soil improvement or for growth media production. The overall global warming factor (GWF) for composting therefore varies between significant savings (—900 kg CO 2-equivalents tonne—1 wet waste (ww)) and a net load (300 kg CO 2-equivalents tonne —1 ww). The major savings are obtained by use of compost as a substitute for peat in the production of growth media. However, it may be difficult for a specific composting plant to document how the compost is used and what it actually substitutes for. Two cases representing various technologies were assessed showing how GHG accounting can be done when specific information and data are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Composting of food wastes: status and challenges
Cerda, A., Artola, A., Font, X., Barrena, R., Gea, T., & Sánchez, A. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.133 · Cited by 625
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Environmental impacts of food waste: Learnings and challenges from a case study on UK
Tonini, D., Albizzati, P. F., & Astrup, T. F. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.032 · Cited by 348
Black Soldier Fly biowaste treatment – Assessment of global warming potential
Mertenat, A., Diener, S., & Zurbrügg, C. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.040 · Cited by 342
Møller, J., Boldrin, A., & Christensen, T. H. (2009) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x09344876 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boldrin, A., Andersen, J. K., Møller, J., Christensen, T. H., & Favoino, E.
- Venue
- Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-09-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 800-812
- ISSN
- 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
- 1096-3669
- OpenAlex
- W2114560351
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0734242x09345275
- The paper
- Boldrin, A., Andersen, J. K., Møller, J., Christensen, T. H., & Favoino, E. (2009). Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x09345275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.