Cited by 17Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

“Apples and Oranges Are Both Round”: Furthering the Discussion on the Flynn Effect

Ceci, Stephen J., Kanaya, Tomoe·2010·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Abstract

While the magnitude of the Flynn effect is well established (approximately 3 points a decade on the Wechsler scales), the causes behind it are still unknown and hotly debated. Kaufman argues that, because of the administrative and scoring changes that occurred with the introduction of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised, Flynn’s interpretation of the effect is not appropriate. Although agreeing that these changes account for some aspects of rising IQ, this study questions the impact of these administrative/scoring changes to account for most of the impact, given the heavy documentation of the Flynn effect on multiple IQ tests and norms over time and around the world. The authors also add to the discussion led by Zhou, Zhu, and Weiss by stressing the importance of examining the role of individual differences within the Flynn effect to understand fully the exact nuances and cause(s) of it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734282910373339

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ceci, S. J., & Kanaya, T.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
Corresponding author
Ceci, Stephen J.
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
441-447
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
OpenAlex
W1970841914
Cited by
17
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Flynn effect, IQ trends, WISC-R

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review