Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Big Three Perfectionism Scale–Short Form (BTPS-SF): Development of a Brief Self-Report Measure of Multidimensional Perfectionism

Feher, Anita, Smith, Martin M., Saklofske, Donald H., Plouffe, Rachel A., Wilson, Claire A., Sherry, Simon B.·2020·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Abstract

The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) is a 45-item self-report measure of perfectionism with three overarching factors: rigid, self-critical, and narcissistic perfectionism. Our objective was to create a brief version of the BTPS, the Big Three Perfectionism Scale–Short Form (BTPS-SF). Sixteen items were selected, and confirmatory factor analysis using a large sample of Canadian university students ( N = 607) revealed the BTPS-SF had acceptable model fit. Moreover, the BTPS-SF displayed strong test–retest reliability. The relationships of the BTPS-SF factors with depression, anxiety, stress, emotional intelligence, personality, resiliency, and elements of subjective well-being also suggested adequate criterion validity. Overall, results suggest the BTPS-SF represents an efficient, easily administered, and novel means of assessing multidimensional perfectionism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734282919878553

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1080/00223890902935878 · DOI
  2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00974 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/00223891.2012.700466 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.12.005 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.067 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0021-843X.85.4.383 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/00223891.2019.1573429 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/00223891.2010.497426 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.035 · DOI
  11. 10.1023/B:JORE.0000047310.94044.ac · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
  14. DiFabio A., 2018, Counseling: Italian Journal of Research and Intervention, 11, 16
  15. 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/per.829 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.437 · DOI
  18. Field A., 2009, Discovering statistics using SPSS
  19. 10.1177/0734282916651540 · DOI
  20. Flett G. L., 2014, Handbook of psychology of narcissism: Diverse perspectives, 43
  21. 10.1037/0021-843X.100.1.98 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00021-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.011 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  25. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.intestcom.org/page/16
  26. Lovibond S. H., 1995, Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales
  27. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1037/a0027764 · DOI
  30. Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide
  31. 10.1007/s10862-016-9537-y · DOI
  32. 10.1007/978-0-387-88370-0_5 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0734282916641866 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.205 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/07481756.2002.12069031 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.013 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0734282916651539 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.010 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.01.001 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.10.001 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/per.2053 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/1088868318814973 · DOI
  43. Smith M. M., 2018, Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 31, 4
  44. 10.1080/10615800701742461 · DOI
  45. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Wilson C. A., 2019, Canadian Journal of Higher Education/Revue Canadienne D’enseignement Supérieur, 49, 60
  47. 10.1177/0734282917740017 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Feher, A., Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Plouffe, R. A., Wilson, C. A., & Sherry, S. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
  • York St John University, UK
  • Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
37-52
ISSN
  • 0734-2829
  • 1557-5144
Cited by
83
References
15
Language
en
Funders
Western University (Social Science Research Fund)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review