The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to clarify the construct of academic competence and develop a valid teacher rating instrument to assess this construct. A 95-item pilot scale, the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES), was developed to assess the theoretical components (i.e., academic skills, study skills, academic motivation, interpersonal skills, and academic self-concept) hypothesized to contribute to the construct of academic competence. The ACES was administered to 56 teachers who rated 300 students in Grades 1 through 6. To explore convergent and discriminant validity, 13 teachers completed ratings of social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence (as measured by the Social Skills Rating System; SSRS) for 60 students. In addition, 32 students completed the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), a popular measure of academic achievement. Teacher feedback, item Importance ratings, item-ITBS correlations, and the results of an exploratory factor analysis were used to eliminate 35 items from the pilot scale. The resulting 60-item version of the ACES consists of five related scales: Academic Skills, Interpersonal Skills, Academic Motivation, Participation, and Study Skills. Internal consistency (median a = .95) and test-retest stability (median r= .83) were high for the ACES, and correlational analyses indicated that scores from the ACES are valid indicators of student academic competence. Implications for using the ACES are discussed, and suggestions are offered for research necessary to advance the development of the ACES as a reliable and valid clinical tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Change in self-perceived competence as a function of peer and teacher evaluation
Cole, D. A. (1991) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.682 · Cited by 127
Cited by
(2013) · Cited by 834
Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis
Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027627 · Cited by 696
Mendelson, T., Tandon, S. D., O'Brennan, L., Leaf, P. J., & Ialongo, N. S. (2015) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.017 · Cited by 113
Sasser, T. R., Bierman, K. L., Heinrichs, B., & Nix, R. L. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617711640 · Cited by 89
Brown, J. L., Jennings, P. A., Rasheed, D. S., Cham, H., Doyle, S. L., Frank, J. L., Davis, R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2025) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2023.2268327 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-225
- ISSN
- 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-5144
- OpenAlex
- W2134904812
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/073428299901700302
- The paper
- DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Development and Validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299901700302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.