Cited by 140Chaos, Complexity, and EducationOrganizational Change and LeadershipManagement and Organizational Studies

Complexity Theory: A New Way to Look at Organizational Change

Grobman, Garym·2005·Public Administration Quarterly

Abstract

There is a revolution in the physical sciences with applying new theories that emphasize holism, uncertainty, and nonlinearity and that de-emphasize reductionism, predictability and linearity. The interest is growing in applying these theories to the study of organizations, including public organizations. The classic model of the organization as a machine has long since been discredited, but the models that have replaced this metaphor have been less than satisfactory. The basic principles of complexity theory are explained using organizations as examples. Complexity theory suggests that organizational managers promote bringing their organizations to the “edge of chaos” rather than troubleshooting, to trust workers to self-organize to solve problems, to encourage rather than banish informal communications networks, to “go with the flow” rather than script procedures, to build in some redundancy and slack resources, and to induce a healthy level of tension and anxiety in the organization to promote creativity and maximize organizational effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073491490502900305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is an optimal point in a system when stabilizing and destabilizing forces are in a form of dynamic balance, at which conditions are created for the system to be at its most creative and to promote optimal learning and adaptation.

    “Both Grobman (2005) and Waldrop (1992) point out that there is an optimal point in a system when stabilizing and destabilizing forces are in a form of dynamic balance.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grobman, G.
Affiliations
The Pennsylvania State University Harrisburg
Venue
Public Administration Quarterly
Published
2005-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
351-384
ISSN
  • 0734-9149 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-4433
OpenAlex
W177354265
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Administration Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
complexity theory, organizational change, holism, uncertainty, nonlinearity, reductionism, edge of chaos, self-organization, informal communication networks, slack resources, creativity, organizational effectiveness, public sector organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review