Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing

Mitchell, Jami-Jon·2001·Assessment for Effective Intervention

Abstract

A growing consensus of the most promi-nent research in learning disabilities for the past 30 years points toward deficits in the phonological processes as the cause of reading disability. At the center of this research is the current knowledge that children’s difficulties in learning to read are most frequently con-tributed to weaknesses in the ability to process the phonological features of language

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073724770102600305

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,303

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, J.-J.
Venue
Assessment for Effective Intervention
Published
2001-04
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
57-63
ISSN
  • 1534-5084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-7458
OpenAlex
W1996898587
Cited by
1,303
References
4
FWCI
41.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/073724770102600305
The paper
Mitchell, J.-J. (2001). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Assessment for Effective Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770102600305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.