Cited by 639Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

The Relationship Between Working Memory and Mathematical Problem Solving in Children at Risk and Not at Risk for Serious Math Difficulties.

Swanson, H. Lee, Beebe-Frankenberger, Margaret·2004·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study identified cognitive processes that underlie individual differences in working memory (WM) and mathematical problem-solution accuracy in elementary school children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties (SMD). A battery of tests was administered that assessed problem solving, achievement, and cognitive processing in children in first (N = 130), second (N = 92) and third grades (N = 131). The results were that (a) younger children and children at risk for SMD performed poorer on WM and problem-solving tasks, as well as measures of math calculation, reading, semantic processing, phonological processing, and inhibition, than older children and children not at risk for SMD and (b) WM predicted solution accuracy of word problems independent of measures of fluid intelligence, reading skill, math skill, knowledge of algorithms, phonological processing, semantic processing, speed, short-term memory, and inhibition. The results support the notion that the executive system is an important predictor of children's problem solving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The independence of the working memory association with severity of learning difficulties from phonological processing skills is consistent with other findings from studies of children with learning difficulties.

    “The independence of the working memory association with severity of learning difficulties from phonological processing skills is also consistent with other findings from studies of children with learning difficulties (e.g., Swanson & Beebe-Frankenberger, 2004).”

    From Working memory in children with reading disabilities (2006) · cites this paper as Swanson & Beebe-Frankenberger, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Montana (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2004-09
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
471-491
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1965873661
Cited by
638
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 36
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
working memory, mathematical problem solving, vulnerable children, elementary school students, executive function, inhibition, phonological processing, semantic processing, age differences, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review