The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions, 1971—2000*
Abstract
Economic sanctions, increasingly used as instruments of foreign policy in recent decades, have been the focus of numerous academic studies. Recent theoretical advances in our understanding of sanctions cannot be tested adequately with existing data. This article presents a newly developed dataset that contains information on 888 cases in which sanctions were threatened and/or implemented in the 1971—2000 period. We describe the dataset, present descriptive statistics for some of the key variables included, and offer comparisons with the Hufbauer, Schott, and Elliot dataset on sanctions that has been frequently used in previous research. We also present simple statistical relationships between sanctions outcomes and some of the variables commonly believed to affect sanctions success.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We know that some targets back down when threatened, but senders must be willing to implement sanctions to maintain the credibility of their threats (Morgan, Bapat, and Krustev 2009; Bapat et al. 2013).”
From Economic Sanctions: Evolution, Consequences, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as Morgan, Bapat, and Krustev 2009
In the citing paper
“We know that some targets back down when threatened, but senders must be willing to implement sanctions to maintain the credibility of their threats (Morgan, Bapat, and Krustev 2009; Bapat et al. 2013).”
From Economic Sanctions: Evolution, Consequences, and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as Morgan, Bapat, and Krustev 2009
Citations
Cites
Multilateral Versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered: A Test Using New Data
Bapat, N. A., & Clifton Morgan, T. (2009) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00569.x · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1017/S0020818300003441 · DOI
- Baldwin, David A., 1985, Economic statecraft
- 10.2307/2615145 · DOI
- 10.1080/000368498325507 · DOI
- Cox, Dan G., 2007, Journal of Peace Research, 43, 709
- 10.2307/2111779 · DOI
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00103 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0020818303573052 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022343398035004006 · DOI
- 10.2307/2009785 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07388940701468435 · DOI
- 10.1177/002234336700400204 · DOI · Paper page
- Hufbauer, Gary, 1990, Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00110 · DOI
- 10.1016/0922-1425(90)90003-B · DOI
- 10.1177/00223433030406002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00259.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2600674 · DOI
- 10.2307/2950724 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002703262858 · DOI
- 10.1080/03050620212099 · DOI
- Morgan, T. Clifton, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
- 10.1111/0020-8833.00032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0020818300032926 · DOI
- 10.2307/2009906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2010117 · DOI
- 10.1080/03050629508434867 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022002790034001001 · DOI
- 10.2307/2538449 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0020818300027703 · DOI
- Wallensteen, Peter. 1983. Economic sanctions: Ten modern cases and three important lessons. In Dilemmas of economic coercion: Sanctions in world politics, eds Miroslav Nincic and Peter Wallensteen, pp. 87-130. New York: Praeger.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multilateral Versus Unilateral Sanctions Reconsidered: A Test Using New Data
Bapat, N. A., & Clifton Morgan, T. (2009) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00569.x · Cited by 230
Self-citationEconomic Sanctions: Evolution, Consequences, and Challenges
Morgan, T. C., Syropoulos, C., & Yotov, Y. V. (2023) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.37.1.3 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, T. C., Bapat, N., & Krustev, V.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morgan, T. Clifton
- ORCID
- Bapat, Navin
- Venue
- Conflict Management and Peace Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-110
- ISSN
- 0738-8942 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9219
- OpenAlex
- W2093146034
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conflict Management and Peace Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Sanctions and International Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Keywords
- economic sanctions, foreign policy instruments, sanctions implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review