The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research
Abstract
A strong current of food-systems research holds that local food systems are preferable to systems at larger scales. Many assume that eating local food is more ecologically sustainable and socially just. We term this the local trap and argue strongly against it. We draw on current scale theory in political and economic geography to argue that local food systems are no more likely to be sustainable or just than systems at other scales. The theory argues that scale is socially produced: scales (and their interrelations) are not independent entities with inherent qualities but strategies pursued by social actors with a particular agenda. It is the content of that agenda, not the scales themselves, that produces outcomes such as sustainability or justice. As planners move increasingly into food-systems research, we argue it is critical to avoid the local trap. The article’s theoretical approach to scale offers one way to do so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory
Agnew, J. (1994) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692299408434268 · Cited by 2,549
Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket
Pretty, J. N., Ball, A. S., Lang, T., & Morison, J. I. L. (2005) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.02.001 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Transition towards Circular Economy in the Food System
Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8010069 · Cited by 607
Berti, G., & Mulligan, C. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070616 · Cited by 403
Global food-miles account for nearly 20% of total food-systems emissions
Li, M., Jia, N., Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Wei, L., Jin, Y., & Raubenheimer, D. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00531-w · Cited by 318
Blay-Palmer, A., Santini, G., Dubbeling, M., Renting, H., Taguchi, M., & Giordano, T. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051680 · Cited by 253
Local food crop production can fulfil demand for less than one-third of the population
Kinnunen, P., Guillaume, J. H. A., Taka, M., D’Odorico, P., Siebert, S., Puma, M. J., Jalava, M., & Kummu, M. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0060-7 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Born, B., & Purcell, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Planning Education and Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-207
- ISSN
- 0739-456X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6577
- OpenAlex
- W2104460807
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 89.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0739456x06291389
- The paper
- Born, B., & Purcell, M. (2006). Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x06291389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.