The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generating and Facilitating Effective Online Learning through Discussion
Abstract
In Christian higher education, most teaching and learning has been confined to the traditional classroom. However, with the advent of computer technology many universities and seminaries are offering online courses and programs. These online courses provide facilitators and teachers with a different learning context. One of the most important social learning components of online learning is discussion forums. These forums provide a context for faculty-student and student-student interaction. For teachers facilitating discussion, this can become an overwhelming task, especially when there is too much or not enough student interaction. This article addresses such questions as: How can teachers ensure that discussion is contributing to learning. How much interaction is necessary and what constitutes effective interaction? How can we ensure that students engage in thoughtful discussion? This article explores how teachers can facilitate effective online learning through discussion. The article also presents a framework for effective online discussion called the Community Inquiry Model (Garrison & Anderson, 2011). The article provides guidelines for teachers to develop discussion board rubrics and effective faculty-student and student-student interaction in online courses. The article concludes by providing best practices of online discussion based on current research and personal experience in teaching online courses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“one best practice is that course design must be deliberate (Fish &Wickersham, 2009;Maddix et al., 2012,).”
From Online or Face to Face? The Modality of a Learning Strategies Course and Impacts on Grades, GPA, Retention and Persistence for Developmental Students (2026) · cites this paper as Maddix et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Allen I.E., 2010, Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009.
- Berge Z. L., 1995, Educational Technology,, 35, 22
- Chickering A. W., 1987, American Association of Higher Education Bulletin,, 39, 3
- Chickering A.W., 1996, American Academy of Higher Education Bulletin,, 49, 3
- 10.4324/9780203166093 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203838761 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant M., 2007, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,, 3, 346
- Lorenzetti J. P., 2010, Distant Education Report,, 17, 1
- 10.1177/073989131000700212 · DOI
- Palloff R. M., 1999, Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom.
- Palloff R. M., 2003, The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners.
- Palloff R. M., 2007, Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom
- Rouke L., 1999, Journal of Distance Education,, 14, 50
- Vasely P., 2007, MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning,, 3, 234
- Xie K., 2011, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,, 7, 17
Cited by
Metadata
- Authors
- Maddix, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwest Nazarene University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maddix, Mark A.
- Venue
- Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 372-385
- ISSN
- 0739-8913 (ISSN-L)
- 2378-525X
- OpenAlex
- W2790012393
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- online learning, online forums, discussion facilitation, Christian higher education, seminaries, student-student interaction, faculty-student interaction, social learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review