Effects of Teacher Self-Monitoring on Implementation of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Mathematics Computation Achievement of Students with Disabilities
Abstract
This study examined the effects of combining curriculum-based measurement in mathematics computation with teachers' self-monitoring of instructional changes on academic progress of elementary students with learning disabilities and mild mental disabilities. Participating teachers were assigned to a control group that did not use curriculum-based measurement, a curriculum-based measurement-only group, or a curriculum-based measurement with self-monitoring group. In the curriculum-based measurement group, teachers assessed their students' progress by administering, graphing, and analyzing short, biweekly probes. Teachers in the curriculum-based measurement with self-monitoring group also used this monitoring system; in addition, they used a self-monitoring procedure that was structured to guide them in analyzing student progress and the instructional plan they had been using with an individual student. Results indicated that teachers who self-monitored their use of curriculum-based measurement revised their students' instructional plans in ways that differed significantly from those of teachers who did not self-monitor all parts of curriculum-based measurement. Additionally, the combination of curriculum-based measurement and self-monitoring resulted in significantly greater growth for students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant gains in math achievement were made, but no differences were found between university-based consultation and self-monitoring treatment conditions.
“Though significant gains in math achievement were made, no differences were found between the two treatment conditions.”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [198]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309334431 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature
Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Dietrichson, J., Filges, T., Seerup, J. K., Klokker, R. H., Viinholt, B. C. A., Bøg, M., & Eiberg, M. (2021) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.1002/cl2.1152 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allinder, R. M., Bolling, R. M., Oats, R. G., & Gagnon, W. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allinder, Rose M.
- Venue
- Remedial and Special Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-226
- ISSN
- 0741-9325 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4756
- OpenAlex
- W2115672559
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Remedial and Special Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- teacher self-monitoring, curriculum-based measurement, students with disabilities, learning disabilities, elementary school students, instructional planning, academic progress monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review