Cited by 222Behavioral and Psychological StudiesCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsEducational Assessment and Improvement

Progress Monitoring Measures in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature

Foegen, Anne, Jiban, Cynthia, Deno, Stanley·2007·The Journal of Special Education

Abstract

This review of literature on progress monitoring was designed to examine the full array of curriculum-based measures (CBMs) in mathematics for students from preschool to secondary schools. We organized the article around two primary concerns: the approach used to develop the measures (curriculum sampling or robust indicators) and the type of research necessary to establish the viability of the tasks. Our review addressed the technical adequacy of the measures as indicators of performance and progress, as well as teachers' use of the measures to improve achievement. The largest number of studies has been conducted at the elementary level, with less work in early mathematics or at the secondary level. In general, the measures have acceptable levels of reliability; the criterion validity of mathematics CBMs appears to be lower than that for reading CBMs. One important finding that emerged was the relatively low degree of consensus on the best approach to use in developing mathematics CBMs. We discuss probable reasons for this, along with implications for practice and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00224669070410020101

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of Special Education
Published
2007-08
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
121-139
ISSN
  • 0022-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4764
OpenAlex
W2102905425
Cited by
222
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Special Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
progress monitoring, curriculum-based measurement, mathematics assessment, criterion validity, reliability statistics, early childhood mathematics, high school mathematics, special education, teacher assessment practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review