Cited by 109Education Discipline and InequalityLegal Issues in EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

State Variation in Gender Disproportionality in Special Education: Findings and Recommendations

Coutinho, Martha J., Oswald, Donald P.·2005·Remedial and Special Education

Abstract

Gender disproportionality in special education has been apparent for many years, reflected in male-to-female ratios that range from about 1.5:1 to 3.5:1. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of disproportionate representation for the disability conditions of learning disability (LD), serious emotional disturbance (SED), and mental retardation (MR) at the state, regional, and national levels. Using data collected by the U.S. Office for Civil Rights, we examined the hypothesis that current variations across states in gender disproportionality should be small, and similar to rates for the nation as a whole. Substantial variations in state rates for students with LD and SED were observed. We also examined the hypothesis that states serving relatively fewer students for a given disability are likely to have greater male overrepresentation. This hypothesis was generally supported for students with LD but not for students with MR or SED. We examined factors related to state policies for students with MR and SED that might help to account for these findings. We conclude with recommendations for research to better understand the basis for gender disproportionality and with several practical implications for policy review and response related to gender disproportionality at the regional, state, and national levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07419325050260010201

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 109

Authors
Coutinho, M. J., & Oswald, D. P.
Affiliations
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2005-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
7-15
ISSN
  • 0741-9325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4756
OpenAlex
W2099560313
Cited by
109
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Remedial and Special Education (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
special education, state-level variation, learning disabilities, serious emotional disturbance, intellectual disability, state education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review