The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doing Anti-Racist Scholarship With Adolescents: Empirical Examples and Lessons Learned
Abstract
The goal of this two-part special issue is to present and engage theories and methods for pursuing anti-racist developmental science and to provide a critical self-evaluation of the field of adolescent development. The first volume in this series encompasses empirical-focused manuscripts that engage in doing anti-racist scholarship through critical methodological approaches (e.g., QuantCrit, Critical Qualitative Research, and Youth-Participatory Action Research) with opportunities for critical self-reflection for scholars, as well as centering research around adolescents who are systematically marginalized in scholarship within the field of adolescent development. In this introduction, we stress the value of engaging in anti-racist research within the field of developmental science and provide an overview of the articles, placing these manuscripts in conversation with one another and gleaning insights with respect to the who, what, how, and why of anti-racist developmental research with adolescents. This special issue intentionally features manuscripts that embrace plurality in methodology, exhibit an openness to challenging dominant research paradigms (i.e., intentionally rooting out racist ideologies, methods, and theories within the field), and place an introspective spotlight on the process of conducting research. We conclude by offering our collective considerations and points of reflection for pursuing anti-racist research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Developmental research on power and privilege in child and adolescent development, particularly in relation to white youth, remains limited.
“While there have been multiple calls for more thorough investigations of power and privilege in child and adolescent development (Kornbluh et al., 2021), particularly in relation to white youth (Hazelbaker et al., 2022; Rogers, 2019; Seaton et al., 2018; Spencer, 2017), developmental research in this area remains limited.”
From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Kornbluh et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Quintana, S. M., Lee, R. M., Cross, W. E., Rivas-Drake, D., Schwartz, S. J., Syed, M., Yip, T., Seaton, E., & Ethnic and Racial Identity in the 21st Century Study Group (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12196 · Cited by 1,245
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ali A., 2018, The crisis of connection, 211
- Delgado R., 2001, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction
- Fine M., 2021, Journal of Adolescent Research, 36, 437, 10.1177/07435584211034873 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203121580 · DOI
- Mc Lean K.C., Riggs A. (2021, June 22). No Age Differences? No Problem. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wmkgr · DOI
- 10.1177/07435584211028218 · DOI
- 10.1177/07435584211028229 · DOI
- 10.1177/07435584211028224 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kornbluh, M., Rogers, L. O., & Williams, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kornbluh, Mariah
- Rogers, Leoandra Onnie
- Williams, Joanna Lee
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescent Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-08-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 427-436
- ISSN
- 0743-5584 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6895
- OpenAlex
- W3194801367
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescent Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- anti-racist research, adolescent development, critical race theory, QuantCrit, critical qualitative research, youth participatory action research, marginalized adolescents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review