Cited by 141Climate Change Policy and EconomicsAgricultural Innovations and PracticesSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey

Open access
Dumbrell, Nikki P., Kragt, Marit E., Gibson, Fiona L.·2016·Land Use Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.002

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Burge, P., Potoglou, D., Flynn, T.N., Brazier, J.E., Netten, A., 2011. Best-worst scaling: Consistency of preferences with discrete choice experiments and stability over time. International Choice Modelling Conference, Leeds, UK, 4-6 July 2011.
  2. Climate Change Authority, 2014. Reducing Australia's Greenhouse Gas Emissions-Targets and Progress Review, Australian Government, Canberra.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumbrell, N. P., Kragt, M. E., & Gibson, F. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
Corresponding author
Dumbrell, Nikki P.
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
54
Pages
29-37
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2273112921
Cited by
141
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council
  • University of Western Australia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
carbon farming, carbon sequestration, dryland cropping, crop-livestock integration, stubble retention, no-tillage, biochar, tree planting, soil quality, soil erosion, carbon price uncertainty, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, Western Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review