The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Household Garbage Reduction Behavior: A Test of an Integrated Model
Abstract
The authors examine the antecedents of household garbage reduction behavior in the context of an integrated waste management behavior model. This model incorporates a wide variety of important factors from previous research on environmental behavior into a single theoretical framework provided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. The model was tested using data from a sample of over 1400 individual respondents, each of whom completed a survey and a two-week diary of his or her waste management behaviors. Overall, the results suggest that this model fits the data well and provides significant insight into the factors that influence waste reduction behavior. The authors draw public policy implications from the results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
Cited by
Chen, M.-F., & Tung, P.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.09.006 · Cited by 1,566
Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1013 · Cited by 1,220
Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers
Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008 · Cited by 846
Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour
O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/s0969-6989(02)00004-8 · Cited by 655
Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1841-9 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-204
- ISSN
- 0743-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7207
- OpenAlex
- W2910696197
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Household Garbage Reduction Behavior: A Test of an Integrated Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/074391569501400202
- The paper
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding Household Garbage Reduction Behavior: A Test of an Integrated Model. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569501400202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
