The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,669
Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing
Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070397254005 · Cited by 1,373
A feedback model to understand information system usage
Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00026-3 · Cited by 266
Consumer intention to utilize electronic shopping: The Fishbein Behavioral Intention Model
Shim, S., & Drake, M. F. (1990) · Journal of Direct Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.4000040305 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016 · Cited by 1,353
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813
Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore
Yang, K. C. C. (2005) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.003 · Cited by 656
Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping
Kasilingam, D. L. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280 · Cited by 636
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-94
- ISSN
- 0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125295668
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 45.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0969-6989(02)00004-8
- The paper
- O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-6989(02)00004-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
