Cited by 212Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Scale Reliability for Unidimensional Measures Using Latent Variable Modeling

Raykov, Tenko·2009·Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Abstract

This article outlines a readily and widely applicable procedure of reliability evaluation for scales with unidimensional measures. The method is developed within the framework of the popular latent variable modeling methodology, and it accomplishes point, as well as interval, estimation of measuring instrument reliability. The approach can be employed with scale components that are multinormal or, alternatively, follow a range of nonnormal distributions. In addition, the procedure can be utilized with missing data. The proposed method is illustrated with an empirical example.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0748175609344096

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hays, W.L. (1994). Statistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  2. Horn, J.L. (1982). The aging of human abilities. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of Developmental Psychology (pp. 847–870). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Lord, F.M., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Readings, MA: Addison Wesley.
  4. 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_8 · DOI
  5. Raykov, T., Dimitrov, D.M., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures. Manuscript submitted forPUBLICation.
  6. 10.1207/s15328007sem1104_7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 212

Metadata

Authors
Raykov, T.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Raykov, Tenko
Venue
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Published
2009-10
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
223-232
ISSN
  • 0748-1756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-6302
OpenAlex
W2018556571
Cited by
212
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
scale reliability, latent variable models, reliability estimation, interval estimation, non-normal distributions, missing data, measurement instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review