The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial effects of curcumin: An in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the antibacterial effect of curcumin with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method in standard bacterial strains. Methods: The in vitro antibacterial activity of curcumin was evaluated against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ATCC 29213), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ATCC 43300), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 700603) using the macrodilution broth susceptibility test method. After incubation in tubes, the antibacterial activity of curcumin was detected by a lack of turbidity, which indicated the inhibition of bacterial growth. The concentration in the tube with the highest dilution showing no turbidity was defined as the MIC. Results: The curcumin MIC values were 175 µg/ml, 129 µg/ml, 219 µg/ml, 217 µg/ml, 163 µg/ml, 293 µg/ml and 216 µg/ml against P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, MSSA, MRSA, E . coli, E. faecalis and K. Pneumonia, respectively. Conclusion: This study revealed antibacterial effects of curcumin against standard bacterial strains in high concentrations. Animal experiments have demonstrated that curcumin applied at high doses has strong antibacterial activity. There is a need for further in vivo studies to shed light on antibacterial effects of curcumin with high concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent literature shows that curcumin and Boswellia extracts share interesting anti-inflammatory and gut antimicrobial effects [22,23,24,25,26,27].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1177/0748233711407242 · DOI
- 10.1177/0748233711425080 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2006-960004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1590/S0074-02762001000500026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1590/S0074-02761999000600015 · DOI
- Bhavani Sankar TN, 1979, Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 17, 1363
- Chandra D, 1972, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 60, 138
- Chopra RN, 1941, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 29, 769
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2011, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 21st Informational Supplement. M100-S21
- Crichton PB, 2008, Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, 361
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0024 · DOI
- 10.1100/2012/637953 · DOI
- Ekrami A, 2007, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 126, 541
- Erenoglu C, 2011, Balkan Medical Journal, 28, 352
- 10.1080/10408398009527278 · DOI · Paper page
- Heggel AB, 2010, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 62, 1458
- Hosny IM, 2011, Journal of American Science, 7, 611
- 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90727-L · DOI
- 10.1099/jmm.0.042275-0 · DOI
- 10.1248/cpb.41.1640 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10735-012-9452-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkn488 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-2952(95)98514-A · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1859-1860.2006 · DOI
- 10.3923/ijp.2011.874.879 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00229582 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-2000-8533 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.051 · DOI
- Sharma M, 2010, FEMS Yeast Research, 10, 570
- 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00590.x · DOI
- Tajbakhsh S, 2008, African Journal of Biotechnology, 21, 3832
- 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.09.001 · DOI
Cited by
Giacosa, A., Riva, A., Petrangolini, G., Allegrini, P., Fazia, T., Bernardinelli, L., Peroni, G., & Rondanelli, M. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14030416 · Cited by 24
Nair, V. G., Unnikrishnan, V. K., Muralidharan, N., Venkatathri, B. N. S., Lowrence, R. C., YBRD, R., Narbhavi, D., A, A., N, P., & Nagarajan, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17404-4 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gunes, H., Gulen, D., Mutlu, R., Gumus, A., Tas, T., & Topkaya, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey
- Venue
- Toxicology and Industrial Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-10-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 246-250
- ISSN
- 0748-2337
- 1477-0393
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.