Effects of Pesticides and Toxic Substances On Behavioral and Morphological Reproductive Development: Endocrine Versus Nonendocrine Mechanisms
Abstract
Exposure to toxic substances or pesticides during critical perinatal developmental periods can alter reproductive and central nervous system (CNS) function in a manner that does not compromise the growth and viability of the fetus but causes functional alterations that become apparent later in life. While some "CNS/behavioral teratogens" are mutagenic or alter cell division, other chemicals produce alterations of CNS development via endocrine-mediated mechanisms. The following discussion will focus on studies conducted primarily in our laboratory that describe how pesticides and toxic substances alter development of the reproductive and central nervous systems as a consequence of organizational or activational exposures. Abnormal behavior and morphology can result from exposure to endocrine-disrupting toxicants by altering organization of the CNS during critical stages of life or activation of behavior after puberty. Some of the toxicants that alter rodent sexual differentiation include xenoestrogens, antiandrogenic pesticides, and dioxin-like toxic substances. Chemicals that alter sex-linked nonreproductive and reproductive CNS development via nonhormonal mechanisms are also discussed in order to demonstrate that multiple mechanisms of action are involved in the development of behavioral abnormalities in pre- and perinatally exposed offspring. The fact that reproductive function (behavioral, biochemical, and morphological) can be altered via such a wide variety of mechanisms…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dose used in the Flynn study was lower (up to 60 mg/kg/day to pregnant female) than that used in the Hotchkiss et al. (200 mg/kg/day to neonatal pup) and Gray and Ostby studies (200 mg/kg/day to pregnant female).
“Second, the dose used in the Flynn study was lower (up to 60 mg/kg/day to pregnant female) than that used in the Hotchkiss et al. (200 mg/kg/day to neonatal pup) and Gray and Ostby studies (200 mg/kg/day to pregnant female).”
From Androgens and environmental antiandrogens affect reproductive development and play behavior in the Sprague-Dawley rat. (2002) · cites this paper as Gray and Ostby 1998
In studies by Flynn et al. (2001) and Gray and Ostby (1998), neonatal exposure to the AR antagonist was through lactational exposure, whereas in Hotchkiss et al. (2001) the compound was administered directly to the pup.
“First, in studies conducted by Flynn et al. (2001) and Gray and Ostby (1998), neonatal exposure to the AR antagonist was through lactational exposure. In the Hotchkiss et al. study (2001), the compound was administered directly to the pup.”
From Androgens and environmental antiandrogens affect reproductive development and play behavior in the Sprague-Dawley rat. (2002) · cites this paper as Gray and Ostby 1998
In both Flynn et al. (2001) and Gray and Ostby (1998) studies, no effect of perinatal vinclozolin was found on male play behavior.
“In both of these studies, no effect of perinatal vinclo- zolin was found on male play behavior.”
From Androgens and environmental antiandrogens affect reproductive development and play behavior in the Sprague-Dawley rat. (2002) · cites this paper as Gray and Ostby 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hotchkiss, A. K., Ostby, J. S., Vandenburgh, J. G., & Gray, L. E. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s3435 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationEngell, M. D., Godwin, J., Young, L. J., & Vandenbergh, J. G. (2006) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2005.10.002 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gray, L. E., & Ostby, J.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- ORCID
- Gray, Leon Earl
- Venue
- Toxicology and Industrial Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 159-184
- ISSN
- 0748-2337 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0393
- OpenAlex
- W2162762716
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology and Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Keywords
- pesticides, endocrine disruptors, reproductive development, central nervous system development, sexual differentiation, xenoestrogens, organizational effects, activational effects, perinatal exposure, reproductive morphology, behavioral abnormalities, hazard identification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Central Nervous System, Environmental Exposure, Female, Food Contamination, Genitalia, Humans, Male, Neurosecretory Systems, Pesticides, Puberty, Reproduction, Sexual Behavior, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review