The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salivary Melatonin as a Circadian Phase Marker: Validation and Comparison to Plasma Melatonin
Abstract
There are many situations in which it would be useful to know the phase state of the biological clock. It is recognized that measurement of melatonin levels can provide this information, but traditionally blood has been used for the analysis, and there are many problems in extending the measurements into the home or field situations. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a salivary melatonin radioimmunoassay and to compare results obtained against a plasma assay for determining the onset of melatonin secretion. The assay developed was sensitive (4.3 pM) and required only 200 μl of sample. A rhythm in melatonin was detected in saliva, peaking at approximately 120 pM or 30% of the plasma levels. Using an objective criterion for determining the onset of secretion (mean ± 2 standard deviations of three daytime samples), the time of onset was shown to exhibit low intraindividual variability (coefficient of variation = 1.5%-4.3%). The time of onset determined using saliva was significantly correlated with the plasma onset (r = .70, p < .05). The onsets determined were 22:30 h ± 22 min for the saliva and 21:50 h ± 16 min for plasma for 17 subjects. Similarly, the acrophases of the saliva and plasma melatonin rhythms were significantly correlated. Neither posture alone nor changes in posture affected the calculation of the onset of melatonin secretion using the saliva approach. Very high saliva flow rates induced by citric acid resulted in lower melatonin concentrations compared to the gentle chewing on parafin film. These results firmly establish the use of salivary melatonin measurements for phase typing of the melatonin rhythm in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Dim Light Melatonin Onset as a Marker for Orcadian Phase Position
Lewy, A. J., & Sack, R. L. (1989) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.3109/07420528909059144 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Benloucif, S., Burgess, H. J., Klerman, E. B., Lewy, A. J., Middleton, B., Murphy, P. J., Parry, B. L., & Revell, V. L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.27083 · Cited by 532
Systematic review of light exposure impact on human circadian rhythm
Tähkämö, L., Partonen, T., & Pesonen, A.-K. (2019) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773 · Cited by 535
“Aoki et al. (1998) preferred the collection of saliva over plasma (blood), as saliva collection is less invasive for the subject, and salivary melatonin has been validated for circadian phase assessment (Voultsios et al. 1997).”
BackgroundPhipps-Nelson, J., Redman, J. R., Dijk, D.-J., & Rajaratnam, S. M. W. (2003) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/26.6.695 · Cited by 394
Kantermann, T., Sung, H., & Burgess, H. J. (2015) · Journal of Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1177/0748730415597520 · Cited by 323
Human Phase Response Curves to Three Days of Daily Melatonin: 0.5 mg Versus 3.0 mg
Burgess, H. J., Revell, V. L., Molina, T. A., & Eastman, C. I. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2590 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Voultsios, A., Kennaway, D. J., & Dawson, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Rhythms
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 457-466
- ISSN
- 0748-7304 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4531
- OpenAlex
- W1626398964
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.