Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proposition d'une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle de la confiance dans la marque

Gurviez, Patricia, Korchia, Michaël·2002·Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)

Abstract

Cet article propose une définition de la confiance dans la marque selon trois dimensions (crédibilité, intégrité et bienveillance), qui s'appuie sur les recherches menées en psychologie sociale et en marketing. Une échelle de 8 items est ensuite testée sur deux échantillons de consommateurs (300 et 937 personnes). Les indicateurs classiques de validation attestent la qualité de l'échelle. Une relation positive forte est obtenue entre confiance dans la marque et engagement du consommateur.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/076737010201700304

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Gurviez, P., & Korchia, M.
Venue
Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)
Published
2002-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
41-61
ISSN
  • 0767-3701 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-2821
OpenAlex
W2335665731
Cited by
363
References
15
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.