The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference: Revised Clinical Diagnostic Criteria
Abstract
At the recent tuberous sclerosis complex consensus conference, the clinical diagnostic criteria for tuberous sclerosis complex were simplified and revised to reflect both new clinical information about tuberous sclerosis complex and an improved understanding of the disorder derived from molecular genetic studies. Based on this new information, some clinical signs once regarded as pathognomonic for tuberous sclerosis complex are now known to be less specific. No single sign is present in all affected patients, and there is no proof that any single clinical or radiographic sign is absolutely specific for tuberous sclerosis complex. Accordingly, the clinical and radiographic features of tuberous sclerosis complex have now been divided into major and minor categories based on the apparent degree of specificity for tuberous sclerosis complex of each feature. A definitive diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex now requires two or more distinct types of lesions, rather than multiple lesions of the same type in the same organ system. Although diagnosis on purely clinical grounds can continue to be difficult in a few patients, there should be little doubt about the diagnosis for those individuals who fulfill these strict criteria. Couples with more than one child with tuberous sclerosis complex, no extended family history, and no clinical features of tuberous sclerosis complex are more likely to have germline mosaicism for tuberous sclerosis than nonexpression of the mutation. Germline mosaicism, while fortunately rare, will not be suspected from either diagnostic criteria or molecular testing until a couple has multiple affected children. Genetic counseling for families with one affected child should include a small (1% to 2%) possibility of recurrence, even for parents who have no evidence of tuberous sclerosis complex after a thorough diagnostic evaluation. ( J Child Neurol 1998;13:624-628).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Crino, P. B., Nathanson, K. L., & Henske, E. P. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra055323 · Cited by 1,793
Northrup, H., Krueger, D. A., Northrup, H., Krueger, D. A., Roberds, S., Smith, K., Sampson, J., Korf, B., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Mowat, D., et al. (2013) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.001 · Cited by 1,502
Self-citationKrueger, D. A., Northrup, H., Northrup, H., Krueger, D. A., Roberds, S., Smith, K., Sampson, J., Korf, B., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Mowat, D., et al. (2013) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.002 · Cited by 854
Self-citationFranz, D. N., Belousova, E., Sparagana, S., Bebin, E. M., Frost, M., Kuperman, R., Witt, O., Kohrman, M. H., Flamini, J. R., Wu, J. Y., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61134-9 · Cited by 794
Neurological and neuropsychiatric aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex
Curatolo, P., Moavero, R., & de Vries, P. J. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00069-1 · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Roach, E. S., Gomez, M. R., & Northrup, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Neurology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 624-628
- ISSN
- 0883-0738 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-8283
- OpenAlex
- W2157197322
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference: Revised Clinical Diagnostic Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/088307389801301206
- The paper
- Roach, E. S., Gomez, M. R., & Northrup, H. (1998). Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference: Revised Clinical Diagnostic Criteria. Journal of Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389801301206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.