Cited by 600Tuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchEpilepsy research and treatmentGenetic and rare skin diseases.

Neurological and neuropsychiatric aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex

Curatolo, Paolo, Moavero, Romina, de Vries, Petrus J·2015·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Tuberous sclerosis (also known as tuberous sclerosis complex [TSC]) is a multisystem genetic disorder that affects almost every organ in the body. Mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes lead to disruption of the TSC1-TSC2 intracellular protein complex, causing overactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein complex. The surveillance and management guidelines and clinical criteria for tuberous sclerosis were revised in 2012, and mTOR inhibitors are now recommended as treatment options for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas and renal angiomyolipomas-two common features of the disease. However, most morbidity and mortality caused by tuberous sclerosis is associated with neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. Treatment of epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis remains a major challenge, with more than 60% of patients having ongoing seizures. Tuberous-sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) are multilevel and occur in most individuals with the disorder, but are rarely assessed and treated. Clinical trials of mTOR inhibitors to treat seizures and TAND are underway. Management of the neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of the disorder should be coordinated with treatment of other organ systems. In view of the age-related expression of manifestations from infancy to adulthood, continuity of clinical care and ongoing monitoring is paramount, and particular attention is needed to plan transition of patient care from childhoo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00069-1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curatolo, P., Moavero, R., & de Vries, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Curatolo, Paolo
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
733-745
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100428079
Cited by
600
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 13
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
tuberous sclerosis complex, TSC1 gene, TSC2 gene, mTOR signaling, neuropsychiatric symptoms, epilepsy, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, renal angiomyolipoma, mTOR inhibitors, seizure treatment, transition to adult care, clinical management guidelines
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Tuberous Sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review