Cited by 112Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Effects of Spirituality and Psychosocial Well-Being on Health Risk Behaviors in Appalachian Pregnant Women

Jesse, D. Elizabeth, Reed, Pamela G.·2004·Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Abstract

Objective To determine the relationships of spirituality and psychosocial well-being to health risk behaviors in pregnant Appalachian women.Method Descriptive study of 120 women between 16 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. The instruments used were the Spiritual Perspective Scale and religiosity items from the Jarel Well-Being Scale. Psychosocial well-being was measured by the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile. Four items measured health risk behaviors.Results Higher levels of spirituality (spiritual perspective and religiosity) were significantly correlated with greater satisfaction with social support, higher levels of self-esteem, and decreased levels of smoking. Sociodemographic, psychosocial, and spiritual variables explained 25% of the variance in frequency of smoking, and in the logistic regression analysis, psychosocial stress was the only variable that significantly predicted substance use.Conclusion Higher levels of spirituality and lower levels of stress are associated with decreased health risk behaviors among pregnant women from Appalachia. Increasing spiritual resources and decreasing stress during pregnancy offer the potential to improve health promotion efforts in pregnancy with women from Appalachia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884217504270669

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jesse, D. E., & Reed, P. G.
Affiliations
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Jesse, D. Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
739-747
ISSN
  • 0090-0311 (ISSN-L)
  • 0884-2175
OpenAlex
W2119501663
Cited by
112
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sigma Theta Tau International
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, religiosity, psychosocial well-being, health risk behaviors, pregnant women, Appalachia, maternal smoking, psychosocial stress, social support, self-esteem, substance use, prenatal care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Appalachian Region, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Status, Humans, Maternal Behavior, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Nursing Methodology Research, Health Behavior, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review