Cited by 282Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and Education

The Canadian Critical Care Nutrition Guidelines in 2013: An Update on Current Recommendations and Implementation Strategies

Dhaliwal, Rupinder, Cahill, Naomi, Lemieux, Margot, Heyland, Daren K.·2014·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances, and are designed to minimize practice variation, improve costs, and improve clinical outcomes. The Canadian Critical Care Practice Guidelines (CCPGs) were first published in 2003 and most recently updated in 2013. A total of 68 new randomized controlled trials were identified since the last version in 2009, 50 of them published between 2009 and 2013. The remaining articles were trials published before 2009 but were not identified in previous iterations of the CCPGs. For clinical practice guidelines to be useful to practitioners, they need to be up-to-date and be reflective of the current body of evidence. Herein we describe the process by which the CCPGs were updated. This process resulted in 10 new sections or clinical topics. Of the old clinical topics, 3 recommendations were upgraded, 4 were downgraded, and 27 remained the same. To influence decision making at the bedside, these updated guidelines need to be accompanied by active guideline implementation strategies. Optimal implementation strategies should be guided by local contextual factors including barriers and facilitators to best practice recommendations. Moreover, evaluating and monitoring performance, such as participating in the International Nutrition Survey of practice, should be part of any intensive care unit's performance improvement strategy. The active implementation of the updated CCPGs may lead to better nutrition care and improved patient outcomes in the critical care setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884533613510948

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent guidelines written by ESPEN, ASPEN/SCCM, the Canadian Critical Care Practice Guideline group and the ESICM working group were considered when formulating the updated ESPEN recommendations.

    “Recent guidelines written by ESPEN [1,2], ASPEN/SCCM [32], the Canadian Critical Care Practice Guideline group [29] and the most recent clinical practice guidelines on early EN in critically ill patients by the ESICM working group on gastrointestinal function [13] were considered when formulating the updated ESPEN recommendations [4].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 282

Authors
Dhaliwal, R., Cahill, N., Lemieux, M., & Heyland, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Kingston General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Heyland, Daren K.
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
29-43
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W2127126415
Cited by
282
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 19
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
critical care nutrition, guideline revision, intensive care nutrition, nutrition care, guideline implementation, performance improvement, barriers and facilitators
MeSH terms
Canada, Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Nutrition Policy, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review