Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Changing Epidemiology of Mechanical Ventilation: A Population-Based Study

Carson, Shannon S., Cox, Christopher E., Holmes, George M., Howard, Ann, Carey, Timothy S.·2006·Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

The number of critical care beds in the United States has been increasing considerably, but it is unclear how these additional beds have been used. Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure almost always demands ICU care and is likely to be a reliable indicator of critical care resource requirements on a population level. The objective of this study was to measure changes in the yearly incidence of mechanical ventilation in a statewide population. The North Carolina Hospital Discharge Database contains data on all discharges from nonfederal, nonpsychiatric hospitals in North Carolina. Authors extracted data on adult patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for mechanical ventilation from 1996 to 2002. The incidence of mechanical ventilation for adults grew from 284/100 000 population in 1996 to 314/100 000 in 2002, an increase of 11% ( P < .05). While patients aged >64 had the highest age-specific incidence of mechanical ventilation each year, the greatest increase in incidence occurred in younger age groups (19% increase for age 18-64 vs 4% increase for age >64). The mean Charlson score increased from 1.76 ± 1.73 to 1.89 ± 1.86 ( P < .001). Renal disease became more prevalent among patients requiring mechanical ventilation (17% of patients in 1996 vs 24% in 2002). Hospital charges adjusted for the medical consumer price index increased by 12%. The proportion of patients discharged to home declined from 45.4% to 34.4%, and discharges to nursing homes grew from 7.3% to 10.7%. The incidence of mechanical ventilation is increasing, and the increase is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities and fewer discharges to home.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0885066605282784

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Carson, S. S., Cox, C. E., Holmes, G. M., Howard, A., & Carey, T. S.
Venue
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2006-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
173-182
ISSN
  • 0885-0666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1489
OpenAlex
W1974515682
Cited by
205
References
2
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Changing Epidemiology of Mechanical Ventilation: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0885066605282784
The paper
Carson, S. S., Cox, C. E., Holmes, G. M., Howard, A., & Carey, T. S. (2006). The Changing Epidemiology of Mechanical Ventilation: A Population-Based Study. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066605282784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.