Cited by 45Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsSilkworms and Sericulture ResearchElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lithium-free processing of silk fibroin

Abstract

Silk fibroin protein was purified from Bombyx mori silkworm cocoons using a novel dialysis strategy to avoid fibroin aggregation and pre-mature formation of β-sheets. The degummed silk fibers were dissolved in Ajisawa's reagent, a mixture of CaCl2-EtOH-H2O, that is less expensive than lithium bromide. The dissolved solutions were dialyzed against either water or urea solution with a stepwise decrease in concentration. When the steps of 4 M-2 M-1 M-0 M urea (referred to as silk-TS-4210) were adopted, the purified silk fibroin had smaller aggregates (<10 nm), similar average molecular weight (225 kDa) and a lower content of β-sheet (∼15%) compared to the sample processing methods (silk-TS-210, 10, 0) studied here. This outcome was close to the fibroin purified by the lithium bromide (silk-Li-0) method. Polyvinyl alcohol-emulsified silk microspheres generated using the purified solution had a similar size distribution and morphology when compared to lithium bromide dissolved solutions, while glycerol-blended silk films showed different mechanical properties. The silk-Li-0 generated films with the highest breaking strength (5.7 MPa ± 0.3) while the silk-TS-4210 had the highest extension at break (215.1% ± 12.5). The films prepared from silk-TS-4210 were cytocompatible to support the adhesion and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells, with improvements compared to the other samples likely due to the porous morphology of these films.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0885328216653259

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kundu. Silk biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine foreword, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2014, pp. 78–99.
  2. Padamwar MN, 2004, J Sci Ind Res, 63, 323
  3. Ajisawa A, 1998, J Seric Sci, 67, 91

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, Z., Guo, S., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Li, G., Liu, M., Wang, X., & Kaplan, D.
Affiliations
  • Soochow University (CN)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaoqin
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
450-463
ISSN
  • 0885-3282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8022
OpenAlex
W2417640789
Cited by
45
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Silkworms and Sericulture Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin, Bombyx mori, protein purification, dialysis, β-sheet content, protein aggregation, silk films, mechanical properties, cytocompatibility, mesenchymal stem cells, porous films
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bromides, Cell Adhesion, Cells, Cultured, Fibroins, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Materials Testing, Bombyx, Urea, Lithium Compounds, Silk, Cell Proliferation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review