The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State
Abstract
Transportation policies, plans, and projects all flow through state institutions because of the substantial cost of infrastructure and the need to assess transportation system performance, including equity implications. But environmental justice scholarship interrogates the state’s role in perpetuating injustice. Most research and planning practice related to transportation equity has relied upon state-sponsored analytical methods. Transportation planners and scholars can benefit from critical assessments of these approaches. We propose a shift in focus from transportation equity to a broader consideration of transportation justice that is more closely aligned with models of social change promulgated in the environmental justice literature and by related movements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095581 · Cited by 6,548
Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 · Cited by 3,353
Justice and the Politics of Difference
(2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q · Cited by 2,872
Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality.
Hamilton, L. C., & Bullard, R. D. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580094 · Cited by 2,335
Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390002500101 · Cited by 2,240
Soja, E. W. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816666676.001.0001 · Cited by 2,239
Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?
Lucas, K. (2012) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013 · Cited by 1,869
Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a291175 · Cited by 1,643
Cited by
Transport and mobility justice: Evolving discussions
Verlinghieri, E., & Schwanen, T. (2020) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102798 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Karner, A., London, J., Rowangould, D., & Manaugh, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Planning Literature
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-05-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 440-459
- ISSN
- 0885-4122 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6593
- OpenAlex
- W3030338287
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 33.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0885412220927691
- The paper
- Karner, A., London, J., Rowangould, D., & Manaugh, K. (2020). From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State. Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220927691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
