The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Cited by
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x · Cited by 1,941
Making Plans that Matter:Citizen Involvement and Government Action
Burby, R. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944360308976292 · Cited by 631
Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making:Six Strategic Planning Choices
Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944360308978018 · Cited by 313
The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools
Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010) · Planning Practice & Research · doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503432 · Cited by 306
Brody, S. D. (2003) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x03022004007 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Planning Literature
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-434
- ISSN
- 0885-4122 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6593
- OpenAlex
- W2058680811
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/088541229701100309
- The paper
- Day, D. (1997). Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229701100309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
