Cited by 103Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaElder Abuse and Neglect

Family-of-Origin Factors and Partner Violence in the Intimate Relationships of Gay Men Who Are HIV Positive

Open access
Craft, Shonda M., Serovich, Julianne M.·2005·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

This exploratory study examined the prevalence of intimate partner violence in a sample of gay men who are HIV positive. The concept of intergenerational transmission of violence, from family systems theory, provided the basis of this examination. It was hypothesized that men who had witnessed or experienced violence in their families of origin would be more likely to perpetrate or experience violence in their intimate relationships. Perpetration and receipt of abuse were assessed to provide a more comprehensive examination of these relationships. The results of this study indicated that psychological abuse was the most commonly reported form of violence in these relationships. The results also provided partial support for the hypothesized relationship between family-of-origin violence and subsequent violence in an intimate relationship. Implications for future research and intervention are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260505277101

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to exposure to non-physical IPV alone, children who were abused in conjunction with witnessing parental violence had higher odds of perpetrating IPV in their adult relationships.

    “Compared to exposure to non-physical IPV alone, children who were abused in conjunction with witnessing parental violence (ibid) had higher odds of perpetrating IPV in their adult relationships.”

    From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Craft & Serovich, 2005

    The Results (page unavailable) report that, among gay men living with HIV, childhood parental abuse correlated with perpetrating physical assault and sexual coercion; witnessing mother-to-father violence correlated with perpetrating sexual coercion. The paper reports these exposures separately, not the odds for children who experienced both, and it does not compare them with children exposed to non-physical IPV alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the majority of studies that generated counter-predictive findings, the authors justified the findings within the same theoretical framework and supported such justifications with methodological and contextual limitations.

    “It is therefore not surprising that in the majority of the studies that generated counter-predictive findings, the authors justified the findings within the same theoretical framework, and supported such justifications with methodological and contextual limitations (Craft & Serovich, 2005; Eriksson & Mazerolle, 2015; Forke et al., 2018; Gover et al., 2008; Shields et al., 2020).”

    From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Craft & Serovich, 2005

    The Discussion reports a counter-predictive finding—witnessing father-perpetrated violence was not associated with later partner violence—and says it contradicts learning theory. It then interprets other findings through modeling and power, and separately lists methodological and contextual limitations. The paper does not explicitly use those limitations to justify the counter-predictive finding; nor can this one paper establish what a majority of studies did. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Men who experienced childhood physical abuse were more likely to express physically abusive violent behaviors in their intimate relationships.

    “Men who experienced childhood physical abuse were more likely to express physically abusive violent behaviors in their intimate relationships (Craft & Serovich, 2005)”

    From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Craft & Serovich, 2005

  • Craft and Serovich (2005) justified their null findings within the same theoretical framework by arguing that IPV transmission may occur in specific types of violent behaviors, such as sexual coercion.

    “For example, Craft and Serovich (2005) justified their null findings within the same theoretical framework by arguing that IPV transmission may well occur in specific types of violent behaviors, such as sexual coercion.”

    From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Craft & Serovich, 2005

  • The risk of IPV exposure is often higher in gender-diverse populations than in cisgender individuals.

    “This experience is equally relevant across gender-diverse populations, where the risk of IPV exposure is often higher than in cisgender individuals (Craft & Serovich, 2005;Peitzmeier et al., 2020;Rolle et al., 2018).”

    From The Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Craft & Serovich, 2005

    The Discussion reports IPV among gay men who are HIV positive, including that at least 45% of the sample experienced violence in the past year. Neither that passage nor the section on violence in gay male relationships compares gender-diverse populations with cisgender individuals; searches for that comparison found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Baier JL, Rozenweig MG, Whipple EG. Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization in university students. Journal of College Student Development. 1991;32(4):310–322. [Google Scholar]
  2. Belsky J. Child maltreatment: An ecological integration. American Psychologist. 1980;35:320–335. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.35.4.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Burke LK, Follingstad DP. Violence in lesbian and gay relationships: Theory, prevalence, and correlational factors. Clinical Psychology Review. 1999;19(5):487–519. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. Cruz JM, Firestone JM. Exploring violence and abuse in gay male relationships. Violence and Victims. 1998;13(2):159–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dell P. Violence and the systemic view: The problem of power. Family Process. 1989;28(1):1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1989.00001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. Dutton DG. Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims. 1994;9(2):167–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elbow M. Children of violent marriages: The forgotten victims. Social Casework. 1982;63(8):465–471. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flemons D. An ecosystemic view of family violence. Family Therapy. 1989;16(1):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Groves B. Growing up in a violent world: The impact of family and community violence on young children and their families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 1997;17:74–102. [Google Scholar]
  10. Island D, Letellier P. Harrington Park Press; New York: 1991. Men who beat the men who love them: Battered gay men and domestic violence. [Google Scholar]
  11. Julian TW, McKenry PC, Gavazzi SM, Law JC. Test of family of origin structural models of male verbal and physical aggression. Journal of Family Issues. 1999;20(3):397–423. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lawson D. A family systems perspective on wife battering. Journal of Mental Health Counseling. 1989;11(4):359–374. [Google Scholar]
  13. Letellier P. Gay and bisexual male domestic violence victimization: Challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence. Violence and Victims. 1994;9(2):95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marshall LL, Rose P. Family of origin violence and courtship abuse. Journal of Counseling and Development. 1988;66:414–418. [Google Scholar]
  15. Merrill GS, Wolfe VA. Battered gay men: An exploration of abuse, help seeking, and why they stay. Journal of Homosexuality. 2000;39(2):1–30. doi: 10.1300/J082v39n02_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. Moore T, Pepler D, Weinberg B, Hammond L, Waddell J, Weiser L. Research on children from violent families. Canada's Mental Health. 1990;38:19–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nieves-Rosa LE, Carballo-Dieguez A, Dolezal C. Domestic abuse and HIV-risk behavior in Latin American men who have sex with men in New York City. Journal of Gayand Lesbian Social Services. 2000;11:77–90. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenbaum A, O'Leary K. Children: The unintended victims of marital violence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1981;51(4):692–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1981.tb01416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. Straus MA, Hamby SL, McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316. [Google Scholar]
  20. Turrell SC. A descriptive analysis of same-sex relationship violence for a diverse sample. Journal of Family Violence. 2000;15(3):281–293. [Google Scholar]
  21. Waldner-Haugrud LK. Sexual coercion in lesbian and gay relationships: A review and critique. Aggression and Violence Behavior. 1999;4:139–149. [Google Scholar]
  22. Waldner-Haugrud LK, Gratch L, Magruder B. Victimization and perpetration rates of violence in gay and lesbian relationships: Gender issues explored. Violence and Victims. 1997;12:173–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Waterman CK, Dawson LJ, Bologna MJ. Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research. 1989;26(1):118–124. [Google Scholar]
  24. West CM. Leaving a second closet: Outing partner violence in same-sex couples. In: Jasenski JL, Williams LM, editors. Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 1998. pp. 163–183. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wolfe D, Zak L, Wilson S, Jaffe P. Child witnesses to violence between parents: Critical issues in behavioral and social adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1986;14:95–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00917225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. Zierler S, Cunningham WE, Anderson R, Shapiro MF, Bozzette SA, Nakazono R, et al. Violence victimization after HIV infection in a probability sample of adult patients in primary care. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:208–215. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.2.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craft, S. M., & Serovich, J. M.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Craft, Shonda M.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2005-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
777-791
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2025808894
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MHR2956292)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, gay men, HIV-positive men, intergenerational transmission of violence, family systems theory, psychological violence, violence perpetration, violent victimization, intimate relationships
MeSH terms
Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Family, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Men, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Spouse Abuse, Domestic Violence, Homosexuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review