Cited by 13Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaElder Abuse and Neglect

Partner abuse and its association with emotional distress: A study exploring LGBTI relationships

Open access
Ireland, Jane L., Birch, Philip, Kolstee, Johann, Ritchie, Alison·2017·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

This study examines partner abuse in LBGTI relationships, with focus on the associations with emotional distress and protective factors. Two hundred and eighty-seven participants took part. Partner abuse (victimisation) comprised three factors; conflict orientated aggression; hostile ignorance and control of communication; and social control and possessiveness (including threats to possessions). Perpetration factors were similar. Significant differences across sexuality or gender were limited to the perpetration of abuse relating to suspicion and possessiveness, where men were more likely to report this than the other gender groups, and women were less likely to report this. Of those reporting abuse in their current relationship, over half reported experiencing abuse in a primary relationship previously, with 60% reporting exposure to abuse as a child. Partner abuse in their current relationship predicted current levels of increased emotional distress, with reduced satisfaction with the current relationship having an indirect impact on this association. Resilience traits were not a predictor or mediator. The results demonstrate the similarity in abuse across LGBTI communities despite the diversity of genders, sexualities and experiences within these groups. The results are discussed with regard to directions for future research and implications for practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.06.005

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ireland, J. L., Birch, P., Kolstee, J., & Ritchie, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ireland, Jane L.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
54
Pages
107-117
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2725817851
Cited by
13
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
partner abuse, intimate partner violence, emotional distress, social control, possessiveness, abuse perpetration, relationship satisfaction, resilience, gender differences, sexual orientation
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Aggression, Anxiety, Australia, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Control, Informal, Spouse Abuse, Stress, Psychological, Sex Distribution, Sexuality, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review