Cited by 62Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaElder Abuse and Neglect

The Role of Adolescent Physical Abuse in Adult Intimate Partner Violence

Sunday, Suzanne, Kline, Myriam, Labruna, Victor, Pelcovitz, David, Salzinger, Suzanne, Kaplan, Sandra·2011·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

This study’s primary aims were to examine whether a sample of young adults, aged 23 to 31, who had been documented as physically abused by their parent(s) during adolescence would be more likely to aggress, both physically and verbally, against their intimate partners compared with nonabused young adults and whether abuse history was (along with other risk factors) a significant predictor of intimate partner physical and emotional violence perpetration or victimization. In this longitudinal study, 67 abused and 78 nonabused adults (of an original sample of 198 adolescents) completed the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale and the Jealousy and Emotional Control Scales. Nonabused comparison adolescents were matched for age, gender, and community income. As adults, participants with abuse histories had significantly higher rates of intimate partner physical violence and verbal aggression than did comparison participants. Multivariate logistic regressions indicated that adults with histories of physical abuse were more than twice as likely to be physically violent and almost six times more likely to be verbally aggressive to their intimate partners than were comparison participants. Having had an alcohol use disorder, being married to or living with a partner, and perceiving one’s partner as controlling were also significantly associated with physical violence. Jealousy and feeling controlled by one’s partner were also significant predictors of verbal aggression. These findings underscore the importance of preventing adolescent abuse as a means of decreasing the incidence of intimate partner physical violence in adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260511403760

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sunday, S., Kline, M., Labruna, V., Pelcovitz, D., Salzinger, S., & Kaplan, S.
Affiliations
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Yeshiva University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
26
Issue
18
Pages
3773-3789
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2101775740
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH043772, R01MH602642)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, physical intimate partner violence, verbal aggression, emotional abuse, abuse perpetration, young adults, alcoholism, jealousy, partner control, risk factors, abuse prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New York, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Partners, Logistic Models, Domestic Violence, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review