Cited by 31Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Law and Policy

Serious Violence by People With Mental Illness: National Clinical Survey

Flynn, Sandra, Rodway, Cathryn, Appleby, Louis, Shaw, Jenny·2014·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of mental disorder in offenders convicted of serious violence, examine their social and clinical characteristics, and compare them with patients convicted of homicide. We examined a national clinical survey of all people convicted of serious violence in England and Wales in 2004. Mental disorder was measured by contact with mental health services within 12 months of the offense. Of the 5,966 serious violent offenders, 293 (5%) had been in recent contact with mental health services. Personality disorder (63, 22%) and schizophrenia (55, 19%) were the most common diagnoses. Most had previous convictions for violence (168, 61%). Seventy-two (25%) patients were at high risk of violence and 34 (49%) were not subject to the Care Programme Approach. Compared with serious violence offenders, homicide offenders were more likely to have been patients (293, 5% vs. 65, 10%; p < .01). We conclude that patients were responsible for a small proportion of serious violent offenses; however, high-risk patients require closer supervision, and regular inquiry about changing delusional beliefs, thoughts of violence, and weapon carriage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260513507133

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. StataCorp, 2009, Version 11 for Windows
  2. Swanson J. W., 1994, Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment, 101
  3. World Health Organization, 1992, The ICD 10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, S., Rodway, C., Appleby, L., & Shaw, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2013-12-05
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1438-1458
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2133224688
Cited by
31
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Manchester
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
serious violence, mental illness, violent offenders, homicide, personality disorders, schizophrenia, mental health service contact, Care Programme Approach, high-risk offenders, delusional disorder, England and Wales
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Homicide, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Violence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review