Cited by 54Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesElder Abuse and Neglect

Are Interpersonal Violence Rates Higher Among Young Women in College Compared With Those Never Attending College?

Coker, Ann L., Follingstad, Diane R., Bush, Heather M., Fisher, Bonnie S.·2016·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Estimates of sexual violence and partner violence rates among young women are generated primarily from college samples. Few studies have data to compare rates among similar-aged women attending college with those who never attended college. This study aims to estimate rates of partner violence by type (sexual, physical, and psychological) and severity (mild, moderate, severe), sexual harassment, and knowing or suspecting that someone put a drug in a drink (drugged drink) among a national sample of 959 young women aged 18 to 24 in an intimate relationship in the past 12 months who were either currently in college (college;n= 272) or never attended college (non-college;n= 687). After adjusting for demographic differences between these two groups, no significant differences were found in rates of sexual partner violence (28.4% non-college, 23.5% college), physical partner violence (27.9% non-college, 26.3% college), psychological partner violence (Mscore: 6.10 non-college, 5.59 college), sexual harassment (15.5% non-college, 14.1% college), or drugged drink (8.5% non-college, 7.8% college). Finding high rates of interpersonal violence among young women who are and are not currently attending college indicates the need to target all young adults with violence prevention interventions in educational, workplace, and other community-based settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260514567958

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coker, A. L., Follingstad, D. R., Bush, H. M., & Fisher, B. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Coker, Ann L.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2015-01-20
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1413-1429
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W1997616904
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
interpersonal violence, young women, university students, intimate partner violence, sexual violence, physical violence, psychological violence, sexual harassment, intimate relationships, violence prevention, college attendance
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adult, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Students, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review